Persistent and transient inefficiencies in the US airline industry

被引:0
作者
Karanki, Fecri [1 ]
Lien, Gudbrand [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Aviat & Transportat Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Inland Sch Business & Social Sci, Lillehammer, Norway
关键词
LOW-COST CARRIERS; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; BUSINESS MODEL; UNITED-STATES; FULL-SERVICE; PRODUCTIVITY; MERGERS; IMPACT; HETEROGENEITY; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The competitive advantage of airlines depends on their technical efficiency. Efficiency analysis models now differentiate between persistent and transient inefficiencies. Persistent inefficiencies stem from fundamental flaws in production processes or ongoing managerial shortcomings, requiring long-term strategic interventions. Transient inefficiencies, however, result from irregular setbacks that can be swiftly addressed, causing temporary efficiency dips. Focusing on the decade from 2010 to 2019, we investigated how business models, mergers, and upgauging influence these inefficiencies. Our results reveal that 21.2% of the overall technical inefficiency can be accounted for by persistent inefficiency. Despite the U.S. airline industry improving transient inefficiency during the sample period, prevailing persistent inefficiency hindered any significant rise in overall efficiency. The research shows that full-service airlines (FSA) and low-cost carriers (LCC) often exhibit higher persistent and transient efficiency than ultra-low-cost carriers (ULCC). However, there seem to be no significant differences in transient and persistent inefficiency between FSA and LCC. Additionally, the results suggest that the upgauging and higher ramp-to-ramp hours may lead to higher transient efficiency. Finally, we could not find any influence of mergers and stage length on transient inefficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 265
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   The effect of horizontal alliances on firm productivity and profitability: evidence from the global airline industry [J].
Oum, TH ;
Park, JH ;
Kim, K ;
Yu, CY .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (08) :844-853
[42]   Cost competitiveness of major airlines: An international comparison [J].
Oum, TH ;
Yu, CY .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1998, 32 (06) :407-422
[43]   The state of air transport markets and the airline industry after the great recession [J].
Pearce, Brian .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 :3-9
[44]  
Peterson R., 2018, TR NEWS, V315
[45]  
Pickrell D., 2017, AIRLINE DEREGULATION
[46]   THE MEASUREMENT AND SOURCES OF TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY IN THE INDONESIAN WEAVING INDUSTRY [J].
PITT, MM ;
LEE, LF .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1981, 9 (01) :43-64
[47]   ROOT-N-CONSISTENT SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION [J].
ROBINSON, PM .
ECONOMETRICA, 1988, 56 (04) :931-954
[48]   Airport regulation and competition [J].
Starkie, D .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2002, 8 (01) :63-72
[49]   Distortions of airline revenues: why the network airline business model is broken [J].
Tretheway, MW .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2004, 10 (01) :3-14
[50]   One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels [J].
Wang, HJ ;
Schmidt, P .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 18 (02) :129-144