Persistent and transient inefficiencies in the US airline industry

被引:0
作者
Karanki, Fecri [1 ]
Lien, Gudbrand [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Aviat & Transportat Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Inland Sch Business & Social Sci, Lillehammer, Norway
关键词
LOW-COST CARRIERS; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; BUSINESS MODEL; UNITED-STATES; FULL-SERVICE; PRODUCTIVITY; MERGERS; IMPACT; HETEROGENEITY; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The competitive advantage of airlines depends on their technical efficiency. Efficiency analysis models now differentiate between persistent and transient inefficiencies. Persistent inefficiencies stem from fundamental flaws in production processes or ongoing managerial shortcomings, requiring long-term strategic interventions. Transient inefficiencies, however, result from irregular setbacks that can be swiftly addressed, causing temporary efficiency dips. Focusing on the decade from 2010 to 2019, we investigated how business models, mergers, and upgauging influence these inefficiencies. Our results reveal that 21.2% of the overall technical inefficiency can be accounted for by persistent inefficiency. Despite the U.S. airline industry improving transient inefficiency during the sample period, prevailing persistent inefficiency hindered any significant rise in overall efficiency. The research shows that full-service airlines (FSA) and low-cost carriers (LCC) often exhibit higher persistent and transient efficiency than ultra-low-cost carriers (ULCC). However, there seem to be no significant differences in transient and persistent inefficiency between FSA and LCC. Additionally, the results suggest that the upgauging and higher ramp-to-ramp hours may lead to higher transient efficiency. Finally, we could not find any influence of mergers and stage length on transient inefficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 265
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] The emergence and effects of the ultra-low cost carrier (ULCC) business model in the US airline industry
    Bachwich, Alexander R.
    Wittman, Michael D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 62 : 155 - 164
  • [2] Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter?
    Badunenko, Oleg
    Kumbhakar, Subal C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 260 (02) : 789 - 803
  • [3] Airlines performance in the new market context: A comparative productivity and efficiency analysis
    Barbot, Cristina
    Costa, Alvaro
    Sochirca, Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2008, 14 (05) : 270 - 274
  • [4] The technical efficiency of US Airlines
    Barros, Carlos P.
    Liang, Qi Bin
    Peypoch, Nicolas
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2013, 50 : 139 - 148
  • [5] Battese G.E., 1995, EMPIR EC, V20, P325, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01205442, 10.1007/BF01205442]
  • [6] Battese G.E., 1992, J PROD ANAL, V3, P153, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00158774, 10.1007/BF00158774]
  • [7] A comparative analysis of cost change for low-cost, full-service, and other carriers in the US airline industry
    Bitzan, John
    Peoples, James
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2016, 56 : 25 - 41
  • [8] Bitzan JD, 2006, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V40, P473
  • [9] Why Can't US Airlines Make Money?
    Borenstein, Severin
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03) : 233 - 237
  • [10] Brueckner JK, 2001, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V35, P195