An interactive estimation of distribution algorithm for unequal area facility layout problem

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Guang-Song [1 ]
Li, Ling [1 ]
Li, Ling-Ling [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Automation, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Henan, Zhengzhou,450046, China
[2] School of Computer Science, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Henan, Zhengzhou,450046, China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
10.7641/CTA.2023.20787
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Both the quantitative and qualitative indices should be considered in order to obtain more robust solutions in the unequal area facility layout problem (UA-FLP) with interactive optimization method. This paper proposed a dual-probabilistic-model-assisted interactive estimation of distribution algorithm. Firstly, an explicit index probability model was established to estimate decision variables distribution through making an statistics to the group information. Subsequently, an implicit index probability model was established based on phenotype similarity of decision variables. In this way, the individual qualitative index was estimated based on utility function. Furthermore, the two probability models were merged into dual probabilistic model which generated new population through sampling. Finally, the dual probabilistic model was dynamic updated based on recommended individuals and evaluation information. The proposed method was compared with six related evolutionary algorithms on the Carton Packs problem and 16 UA-FLP test sets, and experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can efficiently obtain optimal layouts. © 2024 South China University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2080 / 2092
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A heuristic algorithm combining Pareto optimization and niche technology for multi-objective unequal area facility layout problem
    Liu, Jingfa
    Liu, Jun
    Yan, Xueming
    Peng, Bitao
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 89
  • [42] UNEQUAL-AREA FACILITY LAYOUT BY GENETIC SEARCH
    TATE, DM
    SMITH, AE
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1995, 27 (04) : 465 - 472
  • [43] Solving Unequal Area Static Facility Layout Problems by Using A Modified Genetic Algorithm
    Asl, Ali Derakhshan
    Wong, Kuan Yew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 10TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 302 - 305
  • [44] Applying the coral reefs optimization algorithm for solving unequal area facility layout problems
    Garcia-Hernandez, L.
    Salas-Morera, L.
    Garcia-Hernandez, J. A.
    Salcedo-Sanz, S.
    Valente de Oliveira, J.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 138
  • [45] Firefly algorithm based upon slicing structure encoding for unequal facility layout problem
    La Scalia, G.
    Micale, R.
    Giallanza, A.
    Marannano, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2019, 10 (03) : 349 - 360
  • [46] A Slicing Tree Representation and QCP-Model-Based Heuristic Algorithm for the Unequal-Area Block Facility Layout Problem
    Chang, Mei-Shiang
    Ku, Ting-Chen
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013
  • [47] STaTS: A Slicing Tree and Tabu Search based heuristic for the unequal area facility layout problem
    Scholz, Daniel
    Petrick, Anita
    Domschke, Wolfgang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 197 (01) : 166 - 178
  • [48] Addressing Unequal Area Facility Layout Problems with the Coral Reef Optimization algorithm with Substrate Layers
    Garcia-Hernandez, L.
    Garcia-Hernandez, J. A.
    Salas-Morera, L.
    Carmona-Munoz, C.
    Alghamdi, N. S.
    de Oliveira, J. Valente
    Salcedo-Sanz, S.
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 93
  • [49] Unequal-area, fixed-shape facility layout problems using the firefly algorithm
    Ingole, Supriya
    Singh, Dinesh
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 49 (07) : 1097 - 1115
  • [50] A simulated annealing algorithm for unequal area dynamic facility layout problems with flexible bay structure
    Hunagund, Irappa Basappa
    Pillai, V. Madhusudanan
    Kempaiah, U. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2018, 9 (03) : 307 - 330