Carbon Footprint of Spent Ternary Lithium-Ion Battery Waste Recycling

被引：0
|
作者：
Song X.-C. [1 ]
Du S. [2 ]
Xie M.-H. [1 ]
Deng C.-N. [1 ]
Guo J. [2 ]
Shen P. [1 ]
Zhao C. [1 ]
Chen C. [1 ]
机构：
[1] State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing
[2] Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences Environmental Technology & Engineering Co.，Ltd., Beijing
来源：
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2024年 / 45卷 / 06期
关键词：
carbon footprint; emission reduction potential; spent lithium battery; uncertainty; wet recovery;
D O I：
10.13227/j.hjkx.202307268
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Road transport is the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions in China ' s transportation field. As an important means to achieve the“double carbon”goal in the transportation field，the new energy automobile industry will face a large number of power battery scrapping in the future. In order to quantitatively assess the carbon emission reduction benefits generated by the spent ternary lithium-ion battery waste recycling industry，the carbon footprint accounting model of spent ternary lithium-ion battery waste recycling and utilization was constructed from the life cycle perspective. By optimizing the power structure and transportation structure，the carbon emission reduction potential of spent ternary lithium-ion battery waste recycling was predicted and evaluated. In addition，the uncertainty analysis was conducted using the propagation of uncertainty equation to ensure the reliability and effectiveness of the carbon footprint results. The results showed that the current carbon footprint of Chinese enterprises using wet technology to recover 1 kg waste lithium batteries was -2 760.90 g（directional recycling process）and -3 752.78 g（recycling process），and the uncertainty of the carbon footprint was 16%（directional recycling process）and 15%（recycling process），respectively. From the analysis of carbon emission contribution，the regenerated product stage was the primary source of carbon reduction in the wet recycling and utilization of waste ternary lithium batteries，whereas the battery acquisition，disassembly，and end treatment stages were the main sources of carbon increase. Compared to optimizing the transportation structure，optimizing the power structure could effectively achieve greater carbon emission reduction potential. Under the collaborative optimization scenario，compared to that before optimization，14%-19% carbon emission reduction could be achieved. Compared with native products，the directional circulation process and recycling process could achieve 9% and 11% emission reduction potential，respectively. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：3459 / 3467
页数：8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Elgowainy A, Et al., Current and future United States light-duty vehicle pathways： cradle-to-grave lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions and economic assessment ［J］, Environmental Science & Technology, 52, 4, pp. 2392-2399, (2018)
  • [2] Mao B H，, Lu X, Huang J S, Et al., On development path of hydrogen energy technology in China's transportation system under carbon neutrality goal［J］, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 21, 6, pp. 234-243, (2021)
  • [3] Zheng M L, Yang H L, Peng J H，, Et al., Spatiotemporal variations and potential variables of greenhouse gas emissions based on city scale［J］, Science of Surveying and Mapping, 44, 5, pp. 76-84, (2019)
  • [4] Knobloch F，, Hanssen S V，, Lam A，, Et al., Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time［J］, Nature Sustainability, 3, 6, pp. 437-447, (2020)
  • [5] Lai X, Huang Y F，, Deng C，, Et al., Sorting，regrouping，and echelon utilization of the large-scale retired lithium batteries：a critical review［J］, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (2021)
  • [6] Chen Q W，, Lai X，, Gu H H，, Et al., Investigating carbon footprint and carbon reduction potential using a cradle-to-cradle LCA approach on lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles in China［J］, Journal of Cleaner Production, (2022)
  • [7] Wu X L, Wang C L，, Chen X，, Et al., Market scale and recycling technology of waste lithium-ion batteries ［J］, Environmental Science & Technology, 43, S2, pp. 179-183, (2020)
  • [8] Georgi-Maschler T，, Friedrich B，, Weyhe R，, Et al., Development of a recycling process for Li-ion batteries［J］, Journal of Power Sources, 207, pp. 173-182, (2012)
  • [9] Liang Z L，, Cai C，, Peng G W，, Et al., Hydrometallurgical recovery of spent lithium ion batteries： environmental strategies and sustainability evaluation ［J］, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9, 17, pp. 5750-5767, (2021)
  • [10] Ziemann S，, Muller D B，, Schebek L，, Et al., Modeling the potential impact of lithium recycling from EV batteries on lithium demand：A dynamic MFA approach ［J］, Resources， Conservation and Recycling, 133, pp. 76-85, (2018)
12345