Investigating the off-design performance of the secondary circuit system in a small modular reactor nuclear power plant

被引:0
|
作者
Wang X. [1 ]
Zhao G. [1 ]
Qu X. [1 ]
Wang J. [1 ]
Wang P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Beijing
[2] State Nuclear Electric Power Planning Design and Research Institute Co.Ltd.,, Beijing
关键词
Constant pressure operation; EBSILON; Off-design performance; Regenerative heaters removal; small nuclear power plants;
D O I
10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.26.039
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
[Objective] Small nuclear power plants, which find applications in various fields, are associated with such characteristics as compact size, low investment cost, and high flexibility. Analyzing the off-design performance of the secondary circuit in small modular reactor (SMR) power plants is crucial in terms of optimizing the operation and enhancing the overall performance of nuclear power units. Moreover, doing so serves as a valuable reference point for investigating prospective thermal utilization processes, including nuclear hydrogen production and urban heating.[Methods] This study examines the secondary circuit system of an SMR power plant, establishing a comprehensive and validated system model using the software EBSILON. The simulation is based on the principles of mass, momentum, and energy conservation, employing the Gauss-Seidel iteration method. The primary and secondary circuits of the power plant employ helium and water as coolants, respectively, with the main steam pressure and temperature set at 13.24 MPa and 566℃, respectively. The main steam pressure remains constant under off-design conditions. The system comprises two steam generators, a steam turbine, a condenser, a shaft seal heater, two high-pressure regenerative heaters, three low-pressure regenerative heaters, a deaerator, and pumps. The analysis focuses on exploring the effects of power level variations, turbine back pressure changes, and different regenerative heater removal methods on the system's performance. The power level ranges from 30% turbine heat acceptance (THA) to 100% THA, while the steam turbine back pressure varies from 2.5 kPa to 4.5 kPa. Four different heater removal methods are considered. Notably, the fourth method involves the normal operation of all heaters, serving as a control group for comparison purposes.[Results] The simulation results showed that:(1) Quantitative analysis revealed that power level changes considerably impacted various parameters, such as power generation efficiency, heat consumption rate, regenerative extraction coefficient, and high-/low-pressure cylinder output distribution. As the power level decreased from 100% THA to 30% THA, the power generation efficiency decreased by 5.427%, while the heat consumption rate increased by 1 210.487 kJ·(kW·h)-1. (2) Under the 100% THA operating conditions, reducing the turbine back pressure by 2.0 kPa boosted the power generation efficiency by 1.444%, decreased the heat consumption rate by 272.338 kJ·(kW·h)-1, and increased the power output by 7.120 MW. (3) Taking the main feedwater temperature as an example, partial or total removal of high-pressure heaters caused a decrease of more than 30℃ in the main feedwater temperature; however, the removal of only the low-pressure heater L1 slightly affected the main feedwater temperature. (4) Among the three variables, the power level had the most prominent impact on the thermal performance of the system.[Conclusions] The system's thermal performance is optimized under 100% THA conditions. It is conducive to improving the performance of the units by appropriately reducing the back pressure of the steam turbine. Additionally, cutting off the regenerative heaters can affect the system's thermal performance, but the impact varies with different cutting-off methods. Total removal of high-pressure heaters has a more prominent impact on the system's thermal performance than partial removal of high- or low-pressure heaters and causes a decrease in the feedwater temperature. This study can serve as a valuable reference for the operation and future expansion of SMR power plants. © 2024 Press of Tsinghua University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 163
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Advances in small modular reactor technology developments [M], (2020)
  • [2] KOSTIN V I, PANOV Y K, POLUNICHEV V I, Et al., Floating power-generating unit with a KLT-40S reactor system for desalinating sea water [J], Atomic Energy, 102, 1, pp. 31-35, (2007)
  • [3] NASIRI S, ANSARIFAR G R, ESTEKI M H., Design of the CAREM nuclear reactor core with dual cooled annular fuel and optimizing the thermal-hydraulic, natural circulation. and neutronics parameters, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 169, (2022)
  • [4] ZHANG Z Y, WU Z X, WANG D Z, Et al., Current status and technical description of Chinese 2 X 250 MWlh HTR-PM demonstration plant, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 239, 7, pp. 1212-1219, (2009)
  • [5] XIONG Q W, SHEN Y O, DANG G J, Et al., Design for ACP100 long term cooling flow resistance with random forests and inverse quantification, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 180, (2023)
  • [6] VUJI C J, BERGMANN R M, SKODA R, Et al., Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper?, Energy, 45, 1, pp. 288-295, (2012)
  • [7] ROWINSKI M K, WHITE T J, ZHAO J Y., Small and medium sized reactors (SMR) : A review of technology, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, pp. 643-656, (2015)
  • [8] MIGNACCA B, LOCATELLI G., Economics and finance of small modular reactors: A systematic review and research agenda, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 118, (2020)
  • [9] PERILLO S R P, UPADHYAYA B R, LI F., Control and instrumentation strategies for multi-modular integral nuclear reactor systems, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 58, 5, pp. 2442-2451, (2011)
  • [10] DONG L Y, ZHOU Z W, ZHOU Y P, Et al., Study on graphical modeling and simulation of secondary loop in HTR-PM, Nuclear Power Engineering, 33, 1, pp. 138-142, (2012)