Comprehensive Evaluation of Plums Quality Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

被引：0

作者：

Li K. ^{[1
]}

Lin Z. ^{[1
]}

Liu J. ^{[2
]}

Liao M. ^{[1
]}

Yuan H. ^{[1
]}

Liang Y. ^{[1
]}

Pan C. ^{[1
]}

Guo N. ^{[3
]}

Zhu Y. ^{[1
]}

Zhang G. ^{[2
]}

Li H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Institute of Agro-products Processing Science and Technology, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu

[2] Horticulture Research Institute of Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu

[3] Sichuan Wine and Fruit Wine Idustry Assocition, Chengdu

来源：

Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2024年 / 45卷 / 08期

关键词：

cluster analysis; comprehensive evaluation; fruit quality; plum; principal component analysis;

D O I：

10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023060002

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

To investigate the quality characteristics of different varieties of plums, the quality such as appearance, physicochemical properties, and sugar and acid composition of 12 varieties were analyzed. At the same time, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were employed to evaluate the quality characteristics of 12 varieties comprehensively. The results showed that different varieties of plum exhibited rich diversity in appearance, physicochemical properties, sugar and acid composition. Sugar and acid composition, color, single fruit weight, fruit density, and fruit shape index were key indicators for evaluating the quality of plums. Among the 12 varieties, ZH, SXP, ALS, XL, XTL had a positive values, represent a good quality. Among them, the quality characteristics of ZH and SXP were high juice yield, soluble solids, total sugar content, and color quality. The quality characteristics of ALS included the highest total sugar, total sweetness, sweet acid ratio, and sugar acid ratio. The quality characteristics of XL and XTL were high soluble solid content, sugar acid ratio, and sweet acid ratio, but low juice yield. The results above served an important reference to screen plum varieties for different purposes. © The Author(s) 2024.

引用

页码：293 / 300

页数：7

共 32 条

[1]

LIU C Y, FENG C, PENG W Z, Et al., Chromosome-level draft genome of a diploid plum （Prunus salicina）[J], Giga Science, 9, 12, (2020)

[2]

WALKOWIAK-TOMCZAK D, REGULA J, LYSIAK P G., Physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of selected plum cultivars fruit[J], Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria, 7, 4, (2008)

[3]

EZINNE O, IGWE K E., A systematic review on the health effects of plums （Prunus domestica and Prunus salicina）[J], Phytotherapy Research, 30, pp. 701-731, (2016)

[4]

LI Y B, WU L, WENG M J, Et al., Effect of different encapsulating agent combinations on physicochemical properties and stability of microcapsules loaded with phenolics of plum （Prunus salicina lindl. ）[J], Powder Technology, 340, pp. 459-464, (2018)

[5]

ZHOU Y, CHEN Q, DENG H W, Et al., Study on the quality characteristics of several plum varieties in Leshan, Sichuan Province[J], Journal of Leshan Normal University, 32, 12, (2017)

[6]

WEN J, ZHOU L Y, PU G L., Fruit quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of cerasus humilis varieties in Chengdu area[J], Journal of Sichuan Agriculture University, 38, 1, (2020)

[7]

VENTER A, JOUBERT E, DE BEER D., Nutraceutical value of yellow- and red-fleshed South African plums （Prunus salicina Lindl.）：Evaluation of total antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition[J], Molecules, 19, 3, (2014)

[8]

ZHOU S, SUN L Y, YANG G, Et al., Evaluation of fruit quality of twenty varieties of raspberry[J], Food Research and Development, 43, 2, pp. 171-176, (2022)

[9]

JIN Z F, YANG J Q, CHEN H, Et al., Analysis of sweet and sour flavor in eight local peach cultivars from Guizhou and evaluation of their flavor quality[J], Plant Science Journal, 33, 1, (2015)

[10]

MA Q H, LI Y H, LIANG L S, Et al., Factor analysis and synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Dongzao （Ziziphus jujuba Mill. ‘Dongzao’） advanced selections[J], Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43, 12, pp. 2491-2499, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 →