Calculation of modified capacity factor in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

被引:0
|
作者
First Department of Biochemistry, Semmelweis University, Medical School, Budapest, Hungary [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
不详 [3 ]
机构
来源
ELECTROPHORESIS | / 4卷 / 762-765期
关键词
Electrodynamics - Liquid chromatography - Micelles - Sodium borate - Sulfur compounds;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In addition to the expression, k' = (t(m)-t(o))/t(o) (1-t(m)/t(mc)), we propose the expression k'' = (t(m)-t(o))/(t(mc)-t(o)) to calculate the capacity factor in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), where t(m), t(o), and t(mc) are the migration time of the analyte, the flow marker, and the micelles, respectively. The k' and k'' values that were obtained from simulated data as well as from MEKC analysis of different peptides (in 100 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate/0.1 N sodium borate buffer at pH 11.0) were calculated and compared. The k'' value is equal to zero for an analyte remaining in the aqueous phase whereas :it is equal to one for an analyte always staying in the micellar phase. By applying k'' a finite capacity factor can be obtained for an analyte, indicating its partition between the two moving phases (aqueous and micellar) even in those cases when t(m) equals t(mc). The slope of the curve k'' as a function of t(m) is constant through the whole migration window and therefore peak compression does not occur when applying k'' to calculate the capacity factor. A given difference in k'' corresponds the same difference in migration times and this value does not depend on the position within the migration window. Since k'' is a normalized parameter it is easy to evaluate the significance of a given difference in capacity factor or to estimate the relative position of an analyte with a given capacity factor in the migration window by applying k''. Therefore, k'' seems to be an adequate parameter to calculate the capacity factor in MEKC and, similar to k', it also refers to the hydrophobicity of the analyte.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aptamer-Modified Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography for the Enantioseparation of Nucleotides
    Ruta, Josephine
    Perrier, Sandrine
    Ravelet, Corinne
    Roy, Beatrice
    Perigaud, Christian
    Peyrin, Eric
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 81 (03) : 1169 - 1176
  • [22] Enantioseparation of vindozolin by γ-cyclodextrin-modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography
    Kodama, S
    Yamamoto, A
    Saitoh, Y
    Matsunaga, A
    Okamura, K
    Kizu, R
    Hayakawa, K
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2002, 50 (05) : 1312 - 1317
  • [23] Enantioseparation of phenothiazines in cyclodextrin-modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography
    Lin, CE
    Chen, KH
    Hsiao, YY
    Liao, WS
    Chen, CC
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 971 (1-2) : 261 - 266
  • [24] CHIRAL SEPARATION BY CYCLODEXTRIN-MODIFIED MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY
    NISHI, H
    FUKUYAMA, T
    TERABE, S
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1991, 553 (1-2): : 503 - 516
  • [25] Systematic optimization of peak capacity for pesticide separation in micellar electrokinetic chromatography
    Leinweber, FC
    Otto, M
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1999, 848 (1-2) : 347 - 363
  • [26] MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CAPILLARY CHROMATOGRAPHY
    SEPANIAK, MJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1986, 191 : 112 - ANYL
  • [27] OPTIMIZATION OF MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY
    FOLEY, JP
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 62 (13) : 1302 - 1308
  • [28] Characterisation of retention in micellar high-performance liquid chromatography, in micellar electrokinetic chromatography and in micellar electrokinetic chromatography with reduced flow
    Jandera, P
    Fischer, J
    Jebavá, J
    Effenberger, H
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2001, 914 (1-2) : 233 - 244
  • [29] Chiral Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography
    Salido-Fortuna, Sandra
    Castro-Puyana, Maria
    Luisa Marina, Maria
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2020, 1626
  • [30] Micellar electrokinetic chromatography of proteins
    Strege, MA
    Lagu, AL
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1997, 780 (1-2) : 285 - 296