Ecological footprint and ecological security evaluation in the Upper Min River Basin

被引:0
作者
Tu, Jian-Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Resources and Environment Science, Southwest China Normal University
[2] Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词
Ecological capacity; Ecological footprint; Ecological security; Quantitative evaluation; The Upper Min River Basin;
D O I
10.1007/bf02830374
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On the basis of the ecological footprint (EF) model, this paper studied the ecological security in the Upper Min River Basin ecosystem. The result shows that with 2.0382 hm2 per capita ecological capacity (0.4222 hm2 higher than per capita EF), and 165825 hm2 ecology surplus, the ecosystem in Upper Min River is generally secure at present. But the arable land is overweighed and omens an eco-security crisis. Meanwhile, problems such as low forest coverage rate, severe loss of water and soil, enlargement of arid-valley area, frequent occurrence of mountain hazards and degradation of pastures have been major threats to the eco-security of this region. The calculation result of ten-thousand-yuan (RMB) GDP shows that the use of natural resources is extensive, and there will be a rapid increase tendency of EF in the future. In order to maintain the present eco-security, the ways of use natural resources must be improved in the Upper Min River Basin.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 646
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Ecological Sustainability Evaluation of Henan Province Based on the Improved Ecological Footprint Method [J].
Liu, Jing .
2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, MACHINERY AND MATERIALS (IIMM 2015), 2015, :116-121
[22]   Ecological security assessment based on ecosystem service value and ecological footprint in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration, China [J].
Zhang, Mengna ;
Ao, Yong ;
Liu, Ming ;
Zhao, Yonghua ;
Lin, Kangli ;
Cheng, Tong .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144
[23]   Evaluation of ecological safety in mining area based on ecological footprint [J].
Chen, Qiuji ;
Kong, Yunfeng ;
Liu, Changhua ;
Hu, Zhenqi .
PROGRESS IN MINING SCIENCE AND SAFETY TECHNOLOGY, PTS A AND B, 2007, :1951-1955
[24]   Henan Ecological Security Evaluation Using Improved 3D Ecological Footprint Model Based on Emergy and Net Primary Productivity [J].
Chen, Gong ;
Li, Qi ;
Peng, Fei ;
Karamian, Hamed ;
Tang, Boyuan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (05)
[25]   Evaluation and analysis of ecological security based on the improved three-dimensional ecological footprint in Shaanxi Province, China [J].
Zhang, Ruqian ;
Li, Penghui ;
Xu, Liping .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144
[26]   Evaluation and Prediction of the Ecological Footprint and Ecological Carrying Capacity for Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration Based on the Grey Model [J].
Peng, Benhong ;
Wang, Yuanyuan ;
Elahi, Ehsan ;
Wei, Guo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (11)
[27]   Regional ecological security assessment based on long periods of ecological footprint analysis [J].
Huang, Qing ;
Wang, Ranghui ;
Ren, Zhiyuan ;
Li, Jing ;
Zhang, Huizhi .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2007, 51 (01) :24-41
[28]   Ecological security assessment based on ecological footprint approach in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China [J].
Chu, Xi ;
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Jin, Gui ;
Wang, Zhan ;
Li, Zhaohua .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2017, 101 :43-51
[29]   Ecological Security of Desert-Oasis Areas in the Yellow River Basin, China [J].
Liu, Yuanyuan ;
Ma, Caihong ;
Yang, Zhonghua ;
Fan, Xin .
LAND, 2023, 12 (11)
[30]   Spatial Association Networks and Factors Influencing Ecological Security in the Yellow River Basin [J].
Liu, Shu ;
Lv, Wenbao ;
Xu, Zhanjun ;
Qi, Qiangqiang ;
Jia, Mingxuan ;
Wang, Jiakang ;
Li, Tingliang .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (12)