Evaluation of mechanistic-empirical performance prediction models for flexible pavements

In recognition of the potential of mechanistic-empirical (M-E) methods in analyzing pavements and predicting their performance, pavement engineers around the country have been advocating the movement toward M-E design methods. In fact, the next AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures is planned to be mechanistically based. Since many of the performance models used in the M-E methods are laboratory-derived, it is important to validate these models using data from in-service pavements. The Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program data provide the means to evaluate and improve these models. The fatigue and rutting performances of LTPP flexible pavements were predicted using some well-known M-E models, given the loading and environmental conditions of these pavements. The predicted performances were then compared with actual fatigue cracking and rutting observed in these pavements. Although more data are required to arrive at a more conclusive evaluation, fatigue cracking models appeared to be consistent with observations, whereas rutting models showed poor agreement with the observed rutting. Continuous functions that relate fatigue cracking to fatigue damage were developed.