Comparison of the cantilever and two-bay simple-beam diaphragm testing methods

被引：0
|
作者：
McFadden, V.J. [1 ]
Bundy, D.S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Iowa Cooperative Extension Service, Waterloo, United States
来源：
Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers | 1991年 / 34卷 / 02期
关键词：
Beams and Girders--Testing - Diaphragms--Testing - Stresses--Shear;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Two methods for testing diaphragm panels to determine their in-plane shear stiffnesses and strengths were compared. Six panels constructed of light-gauge steel sheets fastened to wood frames were used in this study. Three panels were tested by using a two-bay, simple-beam method. Three panels were tested by using a cantilever testing method. The cantilever panels were tested twice. They were retested after two purlin-to-chord connections on each panel were reinforced.
引用
收藏
页码：603 / 608
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Two Methods to Assess the Size Structure of Phytoplankton Community Assemblages, in Liaodong Bay, China
    Lun Song
    Jing Wu
    Jing Du
    Nan Li
    Kun Wang
    Peng Wang
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2019, 18 : 1207 - 1215
  • [32] Comparison of Two Methods to Assess the Size Structure of Phytoplankton Community Assemblages, in Liaodong Bay, China
    SONG Lun
    WU Jing
    DU Jing
    LI Nan
    WANG Kun
    WANG Peng
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2019, 18 (05) : 1207 - 1215
  • [33] Comparison of Two Methods to Assess the Size Structure of Phytoplankton Community Assemblages, in Liaodong Bay, China
    Song Lun
    Wu Jing
    Du Jing
    Li Nan
    Wang Kun
    Wang Peng
    JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA, 2019, 18 (05) : 1207 - 1215
  • [34] Drug release from semisolid dosage forms: a comparison of two testing methods
    Petro, E.
    Paal, T. L.
    Eros, I.
    Kenneth, A. S.
    Baki, G.
    Csoka, I.
    PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 20 (03) : 330 - 336
  • [35] Comparison of two microdilution methods for testing susceptibility of Candida spp. to voriconazole
    Linares, MJ
    Charriel, G
    Solís, F
    Casal, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (02) : 899 - +
  • [36] Testing the efficiency of two pairwise comparison methods in discrete multiple criteria problems
    Lahdelma, R
    Salminen, P
    Kuula, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 145 (03) : 496 - 508
  • [37] A comparison of phage susceptibility testing with two liquid high-throughput methods
    Parmar, Krupa
    Fackler, Joseph R.
    Rivas, Zuriel
    Mandrekar, Jay
    Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E.
    Patel, Robin
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [38] Comparison of two methods for cell count determination in the course of biocide susceptibility testing
    Schug, Angela R.
    Bartel, Alexander
    Meurer, Marita
    Scholtzek, Anissa D.
    Brombach, Julian
    Hensel, Vivian
    Fanning, Seamus
    Schwarz, Stefan
    Fessler, Andrea T.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 251
  • [39] Comparison of the NIDS® rapid assay with ELISA methods in immunogenicity testing of two biotherapeutics
    Pan, Jing
    Small, Thomas
    Qin, Dujie
    Li, Shawn
    Wang, Li
    Chen, Dave
    Pauley, Cindy
    Verch, Thorsten
    Kaplanski, Catherine
    Bakhtiar, Ray
    Vallejo, Yli Remo
    Yin, Ray
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 63 (02) : 150 - 159
  • [40] Autonomous control of visceral sensitivity. A comparison of two methods for parasympathetic testing
    Jacobsen, MB
    Spetalen, S
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (04) : A754 - A754
12345