Comparison of the cantilever and two-bay simple-beam diaphragm testing methods

被引：0
|
作者：
McFadden, V.J. [1 ]
Bundy, D.S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Iowa Cooperative Extension Service, Waterloo, United States
来源：
Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers | 1991年 / 34卷 / 02期
关键词：
Beams and Girders--Testing - Diaphragms--Testing - Stresses--Shear;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Two methods for testing diaphragm panels to determine their in-plane shear stiffnesses and strengths were compared. Six panels constructed of light-gauge steel sheets fastened to wood frames were used in this study. Three panels were tested by using a two-bay, simple-beam method. Three panels were tested by using a cantilever testing method. The cantilever panels were tested twice. They were retested after two purlin-to-chord connections on each panel were reinforced.
引用
收藏
页码：603 / 608
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of recent nonparametric methods for testing effects in two-by-two factorial designs
    Harrar, Solomon W.
    Ronchi, Fabrizio
    Salmaso, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2019, 46 (09) : 1649 - 1670
  • [22] A comparison of two methods for testing defined formulations of PVC for resistance to fungal colonisation with two methods for the assessment of their biodegradation
    Whitney, PJ
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 1996, 37 (3-4) : 205 - 213
  • [23] Comparison of two methods for testing defined formulations of PVC for resistance to fungal colonization with two methods for the assessment of their biodegradation
    Whitney, Philip J.
    International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 1996, 37 (3-4): : 205 - 213
  • [24] COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR TIGECYCLINE SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING IN ACINETOBACTER BAUMANNII
    Bedenic, Branka
    Cavric, Gordana
    Vranic-Ladavac, Mirna
    Barisic, Nada
    Karcic, Natalie
    Tot, Tatjana
    Presecki-Stanko, Aleksandra
    Lukic-Grlic, Amarela
    Francula-Zaninovic, Sonja
    Sreter, Katherina Bernadette
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2018, 57 (04) : 618 - 623
  • [25] Comparison of Two Real-Time PCR Methods for EGFR Testing
    Ma, L.
    Mazur, L. J.
    Sok, L.
    Baltadjieva, B.
    Mihalov, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 18 (06): : 1015 - 1016
  • [26] Assessing lodging resistance in rice: A comparison of two indirect testing methods
    Torro, I.
    Breto, P.
    Garcia-Yzaguirre, A.
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 9 (04) : 1245 - 1248
  • [27] A comparison of two methods for estimating the status of benthic habitat quality in the Virginia Chesapeake Bay
    Diaz, RJ
    Cutter, GR
    Dauer, DM
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2003, 285 : 371 - 381
  • [28] Comparison of Methods for Acceptance and Constancy Testing in Dental Cone-beam Computed Tomography
    Steiding, C.
    Kolditz, D.
    Kalender, W.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (04): : 283 - 290
  • [29] Comparison of fracture energy testing by means of double cantilever beam-(DCB)-specimens and lap joint testing method for the characterization of adhesively bonded wood
    Veigel, Stefan
    Follrich, Juergen
    Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
    Mueller, Ulrich
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WOOD AND WOOD PRODUCTS, 2012, 70 (1-3) : 3 - 10
  • [30] A comparison of two methods for estimating the technical costs of external beam radiation therapy
    Hayman, JA
    Lash, KA
    Tao, ML
    Halman, MA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (02): : 461 - 467
12345