Market power analysis in electricity markets using supply function equilibrium model

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Tao [1 ]
Shahidehpour, Mohammad [1 ]
Keyhani, Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Elec. Pwr. and Pwr. Electron. Ctr., Department of Electrical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
[2] Electrical Engineering Department, Ohio State University
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cournot model; Electricity market; Game theory; Market power; Nash equilibrium; Price cap; Supply function equilibrium;
D O I
10.1093/imaman/15.4.339
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a surveillance method based on the game theory which is used by the ISO to find whether a power supplier in an electricity market has market power. The paper uses the supply function equilibrium model to analyse the generation suppliers' bidding behaviour and models the ISO's market power monitoring problem as a bi-level multi-objective problem. The outer sub-problem is a multi-objective problem which maximizes suppliers' payoffs, while the inner one is the ISO's market clearing problem based on the locational marginal pricing mechanism. A discrete method is adopted to find 'good enough' solutions, in a continuous bidding strategy space, which are the intersection of all suppliers' optimal response spaces according to Nash equilibrium. The paper utilizes the IEEE 118-bus system to illustrate the application of the proposed method with three suppliers as price setters in the energy market and the other generators as price takers. The numerical results show that the transmission congestion may enhance the suppliers' ability to exercise market power. Likewise, suppliers' gaming behaviour could relieve the transmission congestion. It is shown that applying price caps is an efficient way of mitigating market power.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 354
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Equilibrium Analysis of Electricity Markets with Day-Ahead Market Power Mitigation and Real-Time Intercept Bidding
    Bansal, Rajni Kant
    Chen, Yue
    You, Pengcheng
    Mallada, Enrique
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 THE THIRTEENTH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, E-ENERGY 2022, 2022, : 47 - 62
  • [42] Analysis of trilateral game in electricity market based on Nash equilibrium theory
    Zhang Z.
    Lai F.
    Xie Y.
    Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology, 2016, 40 (12): : 3671 - 3679
  • [43] Market gaming and market power mitigation in deregulated electricity markets
    Lusan, DA
    Yu, Z
    Sparrow, FT
    IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY - 1999 WINTER MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 839 - 843
  • [44] Risk Modeling in Strategic Behavior and Equilibrium of Electricity Markets with Wind Power
    Kang Xiaoning
    Wang Xian
    Zhang Shaohua
    2011 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2011,
  • [45] A supply function model for representing the strategic bidding of the producers in constrained electricity markets
    Bompard, Ettore
    Lu, Wene
    Napoli, Roberto
    Jiang, Xiuchen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2010, 32 (06) : 678 - 687
  • [46] Impact of Carbon market on China's Electricity Market: An Equilibrium Analysis
    Liu, Yuxiao
    Zhang, Ning
    Kang, Chongqing
    Xia, Qing
    Wu, Hongliang
    Chen, Zheng
    2017 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2017,
  • [47] Numerical study of affine supply function equilibrium in AC network-constrained markets
    Bautista, Guillermo
    Anjos, Miguel F.
    Vannelli, Anthony
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (03) : 1174 - 1184
  • [48] Oligopolistic equilibrium analysis for electricity markets: A nonlinear complementarity approach
    Wang, X
    Li, YZ
    Zhang, SH
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (03) : 1348 - 1355
  • [49] Effects of Option Contracts on Electricity Markets: A Cournot Equilibrium Analysis
    Zhang Shaohua
    Fu Xinhua
    Wang Xian
    2012 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2012,
  • [50] Market power effects on market equilibrium in ambient permit markets
    Schwartz, Sonia
    B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2007, 7 (01):