Towards an evaluative framework for software process improvement models
被引:0
作者:
Saiedian, Hossein
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182-0500, United StatesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182-0500, United States
Saiedian, Hossein
[1
]
Chennupati, Kalyani
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Metamor Info. Technology Services, 4000 McEwan Road South, Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75244, United StatesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182-0500, United States
Chennupati, Kalyani
[2
]
机构:
[1] Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182-0500, United States
[2] Metamor Info. Technology Services, 4000 McEwan Road South, Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75244, United States
来源:
Journal of Systems and Software
|
1999年
/
47卷
/
02期
关键词:
Benchmarking - Mathematical models - Process engineering - Societies and institutions;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
Today the modus operandi for software development is heavily process-oriented. This is based on the premise that there has to be a quality process in order to produce quality software. There are number of quality models for software development called Software Process Improvement (SPI) models, which address this important issue. As these models differ in their characteristics it is important that there be a basis to evaluate them effectively. Such an evaluation is important from the perspective of understanding the particular model in terms of its structure, its benefits, etc. For the evaluation to be comprehensive and systematic, it is important to have a framework (or benchmark). This article defines such a framework which includes the most important criteria for the evaluation of the SPI models.