Probabilistic Earthquake Scenarios: Extending Risk Analysis Methodologies to Spatially Distributed Systems

被引:4
作者
机构
[1] Department of Geography, Box 353550, University of Washington, Seattle
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
[3] Department of Civil Engineering, Sch. of Plcy., Plan., and Devmt., University of Southern California, Los Angeles
关键词
D O I
10.1193/1.1586127
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper proposes a methodology by which probabilistic risk analysis methods can be extended to the assessment of urban lifeline systems. Probabilistic hazard information is commonly used for site-specific analysis. However, for such systems as highway networks, electric power grids, and regional health care delivery systems, the spatial correlation between earthquake ground motion across many sites is important in determining system functionality. The methodology developed in this paper first identifies a limited set of deterministic earthquake scenarios and evaluates infrastructure system-wide performance in each. It then assigns hazard-consistent probabilities to the scenarios in order to approximate the regional seismicity. The resulting probabilistic scenarios indicate the likelihood of exceeding various levels of system performance degradation. A demonstration for the Los Angeles study area highway network suggests that there is roughly a 50% probability of exceedance of Northridge-level disruption in 50 years. This methodology provides a means for selecting representative earthquake scenarios for response or mitigation planning.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 572
页数:15
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
The Northridge Earthquake, (1994)
[2]  
Supplementary Bridge Damage Reports, (1994)
[3]  
Campbell K.W., Bozorgnia Y., Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration from worldwide accelerograms recorded from 1957 to 1993, U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Chicago, Illinois, Proceedings, 3, pp. 283-292, (1994)
[4]  
Chang S.E., Nojima N., Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: The 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective, Transportation Research Part A, (2000)
[5]  
Eguchi R.T., Goltz J.D., Seligson H.A., Flores P.J., Blais N.C., Heaton T.H., Bortugno E., Real-time loss estimation as an emergency response decision support system: The Early Post-Earthquake Response Tool (EPEDAT), Earthquake Spectra, 13, pp. 815-832, (1997)
[6]  
Seismic Rehabilitation of Federal Buildings: A Benefit/Cost Model, (1994)
[7]  
Hwang H.H.M., Lin H., Shinozuka M., Seismic performance assessment of water delivery systems, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 4, pp. 118-125, (1998)
[8]  
Ishikawa Y., Kameda H., Scenario earthquakes vs probabilistic seismic hazard, Structural Safety & Reliability, pp. 2139-2146, (1994)
[9]  
Ishikawa Y., Okumura T., Kameda H., Seismic hazard from low frequency-high impact fault activities using probabilistic scenario earthquakes, International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR '97), Proceedings, (1997)
[10]  
Petersen M.D., Bryant W.A., Cramer C.H., Cao T., Reichle M., Frankel A.D., Lienkaemper J.J., McCrory P.A., Schwartz D.P., Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the state of california, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), Open-File Report 96-08 (U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-706), (1996)