A finite element model of the L5-S1 functional spinal unit: Development and comparison with biomechanical tests in vitro

被引:15
作者
Charriere, E. [1 ]
Sirey, F. [1 ]
Zysset, P.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Applied Mechanics and Reliability Analysis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
关键词
Compliance; Finite element; L5-S1; Non-linear; Spine;
D O I
10.1080/10255840310001606099
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main objective of this work is to develop a three-dimensional finite element model of the L5-S1 segment that is able to simulate its passive mobility measured in vitro. Due to their limited role in segment mobility, an isotropic linear elastic constitutive law was used for cartilage, cancellous and cortical bone. The intervertebral disk ground substance was modeled with a non-linear hyperelastic polynomial law. Fibers of the disk, as well as ligaments, were modeled with piecewise linear springs. Flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending torques were applied to the model. A comparison with the experimental results obtained on the same segment for these three major motions was conducted. The compliance of the segment subjected to pure torques was found to be similar between numerical and experimental results for all major motions. Coupled motions and translations were also similar, even in their amplitude. For lateral bending, the normal coupled motions originate from the geometry of the disk and not from the facet geometry. © 2003 Taylor & Francis Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 261
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ahmed A.M., Duncan N.A., Burke D.L., The effect of facet geometry on the axial torque-rotation response of lumbar motion segments, Spine, 15, pp. 391-401, (1990)
[2]  
Asazuma T., Stokes I.A.F., Moreland M.S., Et al., Intersegmental spinal flexibility with lumbosacral instrumentation: An in vitro biomechanical investigation, Spine, 15, pp. 1153-1158, (1990)
[3]  
Goel V.K., Wilder D.G., Pope M.H., Et al., Controversy: Biomechanical testing of the spine. Load-controlled versus displacement-controlled analysis, Spine, 20, pp. 2354-2357, (1995)
[4]  
Grassmann S., Oxland T.R., Gerich U., Et al., Constrained testing conditions affect the axial rotation response of the lumbar functional spinal units, Spine, 23, pp. 1155-1162, (1998)
[5]  
Charriere E.A., Beutler T., Caride M., Et al., Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: A comparative study between an unconstrained and a semi-constrained system, European Spine Journal, (2003)
[6]  
Goel V.K., Kim Y.E., Lim T.H., Et al., An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation, Spine, 13, pp. 1003-1011, (1988)
[7]  
Kim Y.E., Goel V.K., Weinstein J.N., Et al., Effects of disc degeneration at one level on the adjacent level in axial model, Spine, 16, pp. 331-335, (1991)
[8]  
Kong W.Z., Goel V.K., Gilbertson L.G., Et al., Effects of muscle dysfunction on lumbar spine mechanics. A finite element study based on a two motion segments model, Spine, 21, pp. 2197-2206, (1996)
[9]  
Lavaste F., Skalli W., Robin S., Et al., Three-dimensional geometrical and mechanical modeling of the lumbar spine, Journal of Biomechanics, 25, pp. 1153-1164, (1992)
[10]  
Robin A., Skalli W., Lavaste F., Influence of geometrical factors on the behaviour of lumbar spine segments: A finite element analysis, European Spine Journal, 3, pp. 84-90, (1994)