Efficient surrogate-based aerodynamic optimization with parameter-free adaptive penalty function

被引:0
作者
Zhang W. [1 ]
Gao Z. [1 ,2 ]
Wang C. [3 ]
Xia L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an
[2] State Key Laboratory of Airfoil and Cascade Aerodynamics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an
[3] Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineer, Beijing
来源
Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics | 2024年 / 50卷 / 04期
关键词
adaptive penalty function; aerodynamic design; optimization design; reference point; surrogate model;
D O I
10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0451
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Complex constraints must be addressed in the aerodynamic optimizations. Distinct constraints not only influence the optimization outcomes but also significantly influence the optimization method's efficacy. This paper investigates the impact of reference points on optimization design results using the constrained efficient global optimization method (EGO) and suggests a mechanism for selecting reference points that takes constraints into account. Afterwards, for the problem of constraint processing, the constrained expected improvement (EI) method and the penalty function method are compared and found that the penalty function method can find a feasible solution that satisfies the constraints more quickly. However, in this process, the penalty factor has a great influence on the optimization efficiency, and inappropriate penalty factors will damage the optimization efficiency. Drawing on the aforementioned evaluation, this study suggests a constrained EGO technique utilizing an adaptive penalty function that is free of parameters. By normalizing the target value and the constraint value, the feasible solution with the smallest target value or the infeasible solution closest to the feasible region is selected as the reference point. The penalty factor is adaptively adjusted, so that the algorithm can search for the ideal solution sufficiently. This approach can significantly increase the optimization efficiency, as shown by the constrained test functions and airfoil design challenges. © 2024 Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1272
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
QUEIPO N V, HAFTKA R T, SHYY W, Et al., Surrogate‑based analysis and optimization, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41, 1, (2005)
[2]  
JONES D R., A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces, Journal of Global Optimization, 21, 4, (2001)
[3]  
LOCATELLI M., Bayesian algorithms for one‑dimensional global optimization, Journal of Global Optimization, 10, 1, (1997)
[4]  
WANG G G, SHAN S., Review of metamodeling techniques in sup‑ port of engineering design optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 4, (2007)
[5]  
XING J, LUO Y J, GAO Z H., A global optimization strategy based on the Kriging surrogate model and parallel computing, Structur‑ al and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62, 1, (2020)
[6]  
LI Y H, SHI J J, CEN H, Et al., A Kriging‑based adaptive global op‑ timization method with generalized expected improvement and its application in numerical simulation and crop evapotranspiration, Agricultural Water Management, 245, (2021)
[7]  
XIA L, WANG D., Aerodynamic optimization method based on Kri‑ ging adaptive surrogate model, Aeronautical Computing Tech‑ nique, 43, 1, (2013)
[8]  
HAN Z H., Kriging surrogate model and its application to design op‑ timization: A review of recent progress, Acta Aeronautica et As‑ tronautica Sinica, 37, 11, pp. 3197-3225, (2016)
[9]  
BHOSEKAR A, IERAPERTRITOU M., Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis, and optimization: A review, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 108, 4, (2018)
[10]  
LEIFSSON L, KO A, MASON W H, Et al., Multidisciplinary design optimization of blended‑wing‑body transport aircraft with distrib‑ uted propulsion, Aerospace Science and Technology, 25, 1, (2013)