On-demand QoS multicast routing for triple- layered LEO/HEO/GEO satellite IP networks

被引:3
作者
Yin Z. [1 ]
Zhang L. [2 ]
Zhou X. [2 ]
机构
[1] The Academy of Equipment Command and Technology, Beijing
[2] Department of Communication Engineering, School of Computer, Communication Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing
关键词
Geostationary earth orbit (GEO); Highly elliptical orbit (HEO); Low earth orbit (LEO); Multicast routing; Quality of service; Satellite networks;
D O I
10.4304/jcm.6.6.495-508
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, for the sake of better global coverage, we introduce a novel triple-layered satellite network architecture including the Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO), the Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO), and the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite layers, which provides the near-global coverage with 24 hour uninterrupted over the areas varying from 75° S to 90° N. On the basis of this satellite network architecture, we propose an on-demand QoS multicast routing protocol (ODQMRP) for satellite IP networks using the concept of logical locations to isolate the mobility of LEO and HEO satellites. In ODQMRP, we present two strategies, i.e., the parallel shortest path tree (PSPT) strategy and the least cost tree (LCT) strategy, to create the multicast trees under the condition that the QoS requirements, containing the delay constraint, and the available bandwidth constraint, are guaranteed. The PSPT and LCT strategy minimize the path delay and the path cost of the multicast trees, respectively. Simulation results demonstrate that the performance benefits of the proposed ODQMRP in terms of the end-to-end tree delay, the tree cost, and the failure ratio of multicasting connections by comparison with the conventional non-QoS shortest path tree (SPT) strategy. © 2011 ACADEMY PUBLISHER.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 508
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Elbert B.R., The Satellite Communication Applications Handbook, pp. 14-26, (2004)
[2]  
Nguyen T.H., Sadiku M.N.O., Next generation networks, IEEE Potentials, 21, 2, pp. 6-8, (2002)
[3]  
Terms of Reference of ITU-T Focus Group on Future Networks
[4]  
Chitre P., Yegenoglu F., Next-generation satellite networks: Architectures and implementations, IEEE Communications Magazine, 37, 3, pp. 30-36, (1999)
[5]  
Akyildiz I.F., Jeong S., Satellite ATM networks: A survey, IEEE Communications Magazine, 35, 7, pp. 30-43, (1997)
[6]  
Akkor G., Multicast Communication Support Over Satellite Networks, (2005)
[7]  
Wood L., Clerget A., Andrikopoulos I., Pavlou G., Dabbous W., IP routing issues in satellite constellation networks, International Journal of Satellite Communications, 19, 1, pp. 69-92, (2001)
[8]  
Werner M., Delucchi C., Vogel H., Maral G., de Ridder J., ATM-based routing in LEO/MEO satellite networks with intersatellite links, IEEE Journal On Selected Areas in Communications, 15, 1, pp. 69-82, (1997)
[9]  
Werner M., Berndl G., Edmaier B., Performance of optimized routing in LEO intersatellite link networks, Proc. IEEE VTC'97, 1, pp. 246-250, (1997)
[10]  
Chang H.S., Kim B.W., Lee C.G., Min S.L., Choi Y., Yang H.S., Kim D.N., Kim C.S., FSA-based link assignment and routing in low-Earth orbit satellite networks, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 47, 3, pp. 1037-1048, (1998)