Interactively Learning Rough Strategies That Dynamically Satisfy Investor's Preferences in Multiobjective Index Tracking

被引:0
作者
Soares Silva, Julio Cezar [1 ]
de Almeida Filho, Adiel Teixeira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Federalde Pernambuco, Ctr Informat, BR-50740560 Recife, Brazil
关键词
Portfolios; Indexes; Optimization; Evolutionary computation; Costs; Process control; Minimization; Dominance-based rough set approach; evolutionary algorithm; index tracking; interactive multiobjective optimization; portfolio optimization; PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; COGNITIVE LOAD; TIME; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; ROBUST;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2023.3321341
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiobjective index tracking models optimize portfolios considering investors' desire to replicate or outperform a market index. It is possible to search for the best portfolio in the optimal Pareto Front for a given investor with interactive multiobjective optimization using dominance-based rough sets approach (IMO-DRSA). However, obtaining the optimal Pareto front can be impractical as the index size grows. Therefore, evolutionary multiobjective approaches (EMO) can be used to find good fronts in a reasonable time. A simulated IMO-DRSA approach was adopted and extended to offer insights on how to design interactive processes for index tracking considering the stochastic output of EMO. The extended simulated IMO-DRSA approach analyzes how different factors, such as the number of interactions and methods for cognitive effort reduction, affect the capacity of an EMO to produce good portfolios for different types of artificial investors during interactions and to maintain their goodness over time. In contrast to previous studies, this research explores various approaches for displaying potential portfolios to investors and investigates the performance of an evolutionary algorithm guided by IMO-DRSA in multiple problem instances with an increased number of objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:1412 / 1426
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem: An experimental evaluation of five multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
    Anagnostopoulos, K. P.
    Mamanis, G.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) : 14208 - 14217
  • [2] A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables
    Anagnostopoulos, K. P.
    Mamanis, G.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (07) : 1285 - 1297
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Journal of Business Economics
  • [4] Planning urban pavement maintenance by a new interactive multiobjective optimization approach
    Augeri, Maria Grazia
    Greco, Salvatore
    Nicolosi, Vittorio
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [5] Sparse Portfolios for High-Dimensional Financial Index Tracking
    Benidis, Konstantinos
    Feng, Yiyong
    Palomar, Daniel P.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 66 (01) : 155 - 170
  • [6] A fuzzy multi-objective approach for sustainable investments
    Bilbao-Terol, Amelia
    Arenas-Parra, Mar
    Canal-Fernandez, Veronica
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (12) : 10904 - 10915
  • [7] Blaszczynski J., 2013, Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems - Professor Zdzislaw Pawlak in Memoriam, P185, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30344-9_5
  • [8] New complex fuzzy multiple objective programming procedure for a portfolio making under uncertainty
    Borovicka, Adam
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 96
  • [9] Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization
    Branke, Juergen
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Slowinski, Roman
    Zielniewicz, Piotr
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 250 (03) : 884 - 901
  • [10] A linear risk-return model for enhanced indexation in portfolio optimization
    Bruni, Renato
    Cesarone, Francesco
    Scozzari, Andrea
    Tardella, Fabio
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2015, 37 (03) : 735 - 759