Comparative efficacy of anaerobic digestion systems in removing antimicrobial resistance genes from swine wastewater

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Da [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Xiaomin [3 ]
Shen, Yingbo [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ying [4 ]
Luo, Sunlin [4 ]
Jin, Yongpeng [4 ]
Zhai, Weishuai [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Zhaoju [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Chengtao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Dejun [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Xin [5 ]
Xie, Youzhi [5 ]
Wu, Congming [1 ,2 ]
Schwarz, Stefan [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Shen, Jianzhong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yiqiang [4 ]
Ma, Shizhen [2 ]
Wang, Yang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Technol Innovat Ctr Food Safety Surveillance & Det, Sanya Inst, Sanya 572025, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Vet Med, Natl Key Lab Vet Publ Hlth Safety, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Univ Agr, Anim Sci & Technol Coll, Beijing Key Lab Tradit Chinese Vet Med, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[4] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Anim Nutr, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[5] Hainan Anim Dis Control Ctr, Haikou 571100, Peoples R China
[6] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Microbiol & Epizoot, Ctr Infect Med, Sch Vet Med, D-14163 Berlin, Germany
[7] Free Univ Berlin, Vet Ctr Resistance Res TZR, Sch Vet Med, D-14163 Berlin, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Antimicrobial resistance genes; Anaerobic digestion; Mobile genetic elements; Antibiotic residues; Heavy metals; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; HEAVY-METALS; DISSEMINATION; TEMPERATURE; MANURES; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136868
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Swine farm wastewater is a major reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). Anaerobic digestion (AD), widely implemented in farms, has been extensively studied for ARG removal. However, a comparative study on ARG removal efficiency across the four principal AD systems - up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB), continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), buried biogas digester (BBD), and septic tank (SPT) - is lacking. Herein, we employed metagenomic sequencing, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, as well as atomic absorption spectrometry/atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry, and revealed that UASB and CSTR achieved higher removal efficiencies for both ARGs (67% and 57%) and antibiotic residues (100% and 90%) compared to BBD and SPT. Acinetobacter, Escherichia, Pseudomonas and Streptococcus were the primary ARG hosts, comprising over 65% of the total abundance in influent samples. UASB and CSTR systems demonstrated superior removal efficiencies for both mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and antibiotic residues, both of which had essential impacts on ARG profiles. In addition, heavy metals might contribute to variation in ARGs through horizontal gene transfer. Collectively, the variation in microbial communities and better removal of both MGEs and antibiotic residues contribute to the remarkable ARG removal efficiency of UASB and CSTR, therefore, advocating for the widespread adoption of these two AD systems in swine farms.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of anaerobic digestion wastewater treatment systems in reducing antimicrobial resistance bacteria in wastewater from swine farms in Thailand
    Changkaew, Kanjana
    Wongsoonthornchai, Manaporn
    Thitanuwat, Bussarakam
    Changkwanyeun, Ruchirada
    Yoogate, Phashararat
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2025, 23 (03) : 384 - 396
  • [2] Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in anaerobic digestion and land application of swine wastewater
    Sui, Qianwen
    Zhang, Junya
    Chen, Meixue
    Tong, Juan
    Wang, Rui
    Wei, Yuansong
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 213 : 751 - 759
  • [3] Recent advances on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater
    Lourinho, G.
    Rodrigues, L. F. T. G.
    Brito, P. S. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 17 (12) : 4917 - 4938
  • [4] Recent advances on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater
    G. Lourinho
    L. F. T. G. Rodrigues
    P. S. D. Brito
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 17 : 4917 - 4938
  • [5] Inhibition of tetracycline on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater
    Liu, Yiwei
    Li, Xiang
    Tan, Zhao
    Yang, Chunping
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 334 (334)
  • [6] Enhanced Strategies for Antibiotic Removal from Swine Wastewater in Anaerobic Digestion
    Zhou, Qi
    Li, Xiang
    Wu, Shaohua
    Zhong, Yuanyuan
    Yang, Chunping
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) : 8 - 11
  • [7] The effect of calcium on the anaerobic digestion treating swine wastewater
    Ahn, Johng-Hwa
    Do, Trong Hoan
    Kim, Sang D.
    Hwang, Seokhwan
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2006, 30 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [8] A model for methane production in anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater
    Yang, Hongnan
    Deng, Liangwei
    Liu, Gangjin
    Yang, Di
    Liu, Yi
    Chen, Ziai
    WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 102 : 464 - 474
  • [9] The effect of different inoculums on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater
    Cordoba, Veronica
    Fernandez, Monica
    Santalla, Estela
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [10] High rate anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor
    Jiang, Mengmeng
    Westerholm, Maria
    Qiao, Wei
    Wandera, Simon M.
    Dong, Renjie
    ENERGY, 2020, 193 : 677 - 687