Decision making model for material selection using a hybrid MCDM technique

被引：0

作者：

机构：

[1] Mechanical Engineering, GIT, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam-530045, A.P.

[2] Indian Navy

来源：

Jajimoggala, S. (sarojini.jaji@gmail.com) | 1600年 / Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland卷 / 06期

关键词：

Fahp; Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; Material selection; MCDM; Multiple criteria decision making; Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution; TOPSIS;

D O I：

10.1504/IJADS.2013.053273

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In today's market place, the selection of material for a particular application is a challenging task, as the selected material directly determines the visible quality and the cost of the product. The large number of available materials, together with the complex relationships between various selection parameters, often makes the selection process a difficult task. For these reasons, MCDM has been found to be a useful approach to solve this kind of problem. In this work, a user friendly two-stage decision support hybrid MCDM model is developed. The first stage is to prioritise the different criteria using and the second stage is to select the material using TOPSIS. An example is solved to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the suggested model to the material selection for an impellor and AISI 4340 was found to be the best material alternative based on the given priorities of the criteria. Copyright © 2013 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

引用

页码：144 / 159

页数：15

共 26 条

[1]

Athanasopoulos G., Riba C.R., Athanasopoulou C., A decision support system for coating selection based on fuzzy logic and multi-criteria decision making, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 8, pp. 10848-10853, (2009)

[2]

Bozdag C.E., Kahraman C., Ruan D., Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems, Computers in Industry, 51, 1, pp. 13-29, (2003)

[3]

Chang D.-Y., Extent analysis and synthetic decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications, 732, 1, pp. 352-355, (1992)

[4]

Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S., Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Mater. Des., 30, 10, pp. 4043-4053, (2009)

[5]

Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S., Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods, Mater. Des., 32, 2, pp. 851-860, (2011)

[6]

Davies M.A.P., A multi criteria decision model application for managing group decisions, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 1, pp. 47-58, (1994)

[7]

Deng Y.-M., Edwards K.L., The role of materials identification and selection in engineering design, Mater. Des., 28, 1, pp. 131-139, (2007)

[8]

Dowson P., Bauer D., Laney S., Selection of materials and material related processes for centrifugal compressors and steam turbines in the oil and petrochemical industry, Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Turbo-Machinery Symposium-2008, (2008)

[9]

Edwards K.L., Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components, Mater. Des., 26, 5, pp. 469-472, (2005)

[10]

Gupta N., Material selection for thin-film solar cells using multiple attribute decision making approach, Mater. Des., 32, 3, pp. 1667-1671, (2011)

← 1 2 3 →