Analysis of semi-active suspension systems for four-axles off-road vehicle using half model

被引:4
作者
Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia , College of Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), College of Engineering, Kuala Lumpur
[2] Department of Mechatronics Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), College of Engineering, Kuala Lumpur
来源
Int. J. Veh. Noise Vib. | 2009年 / 1-2卷 / 91-115期
关键词
Ground-hook; Hybrid; Off-road vehicle; Our-axle half-vehicle; Passive suspension system; Ride comfort; Semi-active control system; Skyhook;
D O I
10.1504/IJVNV.2009.029193
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Handling and ride quality are affected by many factors, including high-frequency vibrations, body booming, body roll and pitch motion, vertical motion by the suspension system and frequency vibration transmitted from the road input excitations. This article focuses on the most significant vibration source that affects handling and ride quality, which is the suspension system. Passive suspension has been taken as the starting point of this work, in which we discuss the model in context. Semi-active suspension systems are introduced with the aim of exploring the performance of the system compared with passive suspension. Several control policies of semi-active systems, namely, skyhook, ground-hook and hybrid controls, are presented. Their ride comfort, suspension displacement and roadholding performances are analysed and compared with passive systems. The analysis covers both transient and steady-state responses in the time domain and transmissibility response in the frequency domain. The results show that the hybrid control policy yields better comfort than a passive suspension, without reducing the road-holding quality or increasing the suspension displacement for a typical off-road vehicle. The hybrid control policy is also shown to provide a better compromise between comfort, road-holding and suspension displacement than the skyhook and ground-hook control policies. Copyright © 2009, Inderscience Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 115
页数:24
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Alleyne A., Neuhaus P.D., Hedrick J.K., Application of nonlinear control theory to electronically controlled suspensions, Vehicle System Dynamics, 22, 5-6, pp. 309-320, (1993)
[2]  
Barak P., Passive versus Active and Semi-active Suspension from Theory to Application in North American Industry, (1992)
[3]  
Crolla D.A., Abdel-Hady M.B.A., Active suspension control: Performance comparison using control laws applied to a full-vehicle model, Vehicle System Dynamic, 20, 2, pp. 107-120, (1991)
[4]  
Carter A.K., Transient Motion Control of Passive and Semi-active Damping for Vehicle Suspensions, (1998)
[5]  
Koo J.H., Goncalves F.D., Ahmadian M., Investigation of the response time of magnetorheological fluid dampers, Proceedings of SPIE 2004 Smart Structures and Materials/NDE, pp. 63-71, (2004)
[6]  
Karnopp D.C., Crosby M.J., System for Controlling the Transmission of Energy between Spaced Members, (1974)
[7]  
Michele I., Patrizio T., Mauro M., Development of a heavy truck semi-active suspension control', Centro Ricerche Fiat, Strada Torino 50, 10043 Orbassano (Turin), Italy, Control Engineering Practice, 14, pp. 305-312, (2006)