Advanced machine vision techniques for groundwater level prediction modeling geospatial and statistical research

被引:2
|
作者
Xianglin, Dai [1 ]
Tariq, Aqil [2 ]
Jamil, Ahsan [3 ]
Aslam, Rana Waqar [4 ]
Zafar, Zeeshan [5 ]
Bailek, Nadjem [2 ,6 ,7 ]
Zhran, Mohamed [3 ,8 ]
Almutairi, Khalid F. [9 ]
Soufan, Walid [9 ]
机构
[1] Huanghuai Univ, Sch Intelligent Mfg, Zhumadian 463000, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Forest Resources, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
[3] New Mex State Univ, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, 3170S Espina Str, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying, Mapping & Remote Sensing, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[6] Ahmed Draia Adrar Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Lab Math Modeling & Applicat, Adrar, Algeria
[7] Middle East Univ, MEU Res Unit, Amman, Jordan
[8] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Publ Works Engn Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[9] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Plant Prod Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Comparative Statistical Modeling; Machine vision; ROC Curve Analysis; Earth observation techniques; Groundwater potential zones; Multi- Spectral satellite imagery; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.018
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This study utilizes three models, namely Weight of Evidence (WOE), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Index of Vulnerability (IV), to identify groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) in southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Nowshera District, Pakistan. We incorporated a total of twelve variables, encompassing elevation, slope, distance to the rivers, rainfall, curvature, drainage density, land use/land cover, topographic wetness index, height above the nearest drainage, NDVI, distance to the roads, and soil type, utilizing ArcGIS 10.8. The AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) assessed the dependability of the models. GWPZ was categorized into five classifications: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The WOE model produced distributions of 10.14 % (262.09 km2), 19.58 % (506.00 km2), 26.75 % (691.10 km2), 27.10 % (700.18 km2), and 16.40 % (423.75 km2) respectively. The FR yielded 20.93 % (538.90 km2), 32.38 % (833.53 km2), 18.92 % (487.14 km2), 13.13 % (337.94 km2), and 14.61 % (376.07 km2). The IV model resulted in 14.41 % (372.46 km2), 17.17 % (443.67 km2), 29.01 % (749.52 km2), 25.85 % (667.97 km2), and 13.53 % (349.50 km2). The AUC-ROC for WOE, FR, and IV were 58.06%, 87.53%, and 84.98%, respectively. All models accurately defined the GWPZ, with the FR approach demonstrating notable potential. These findings provide vital information for managing groundwater resources and the design of metropolitan areas. Our developed methodology can be used in places with comparable characteristics. It is a valuable tool for policy- makers interested in sustainable groundwater management. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2652 / 2668
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhancing flood risk assessment in northern Morocco with tuned machine learning and advanced geospatial techniques
    Moutaouakil, Wassima
    Hamida, Soufiane
    Saleh, Shawki
    Lamrani, Driss
    Mahjoubi, Mohamed Amine
    Cherradi, Bouchaib
    Raihani, Abdelhadi
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 34 (12) : 2477 - 2508
  • [42] Foot Modeling Based on Machine Vision and Social Manufacturing Research
    Peng, Hongli
    Shen, Zhen
    Shang, Xiuqin
    Liu, Xiwei
    Xiong, Gang
    Liu, Taozhong
    Nyberg, Timo R.
    IMAGE AND VIDEO TECHNOLOGY (PSIVT 2017), 2018, 10799 : 144 - 157
  • [43] A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Models and A Statistical Method for Groundwater Level Prediction
    Poursaeid, Mojtaba
    Poursaeid, Amir Houssain
    Shabanlou, Saeid
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (05) : 1499 - 1519
  • [44] A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Models and A Statistical Method for Groundwater Level Prediction
    Mojtaba Poursaeid
    Amir Houssain Poursaeid
    Saeid Shabanlou
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 1499 - 1519
  • [45] Developing groundwater potentiality models by coupling ensemble machine learning algorithms and statistical techniques for sustainable groundwater management
    Mallick, Javed
    Naikoo, Mohd Waseem
    Talukdar, Swapan
    Ahmed, Ishita Afreen
    Rahman, Atiqur
    Islam, Abu Reza Md Towfiqul
    Pal, Swades
    Ghose, Bonosri
    Shashtri, Satyanarayan
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (25) : 7927 - 7953
  • [46] Enhancing groundwater level prediction accuracy at a daily scale through combined machine learning and physics-based modeling
    Sun, Kangning
    Hu, Litang
    Sun, Jianchong
    Cao, Xiaoyuan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 50
  • [47] Statistical modeling of spatial and temporal vulnerability of groundwater level in the Gaza Strip (Palestine)
    Al-Najjar, Hassan
    Ceribasi, Gokmen
    Dogan, Emrah
    Qahman, Khalid
    Abualtayef, Mazen
    Ceyhunlu, Ahmet Iyad
    H2OPEN JOURNAL, 2021,
  • [48] Research on Mass Prediction of Maize Kernel Based on Machine Vision and Machine Learning Algorithm
    Yu, Yang
    Fan, Chenlong
    Li, Qibin
    Wu, Qinhao
    Cheng, Yi
    Zhou, Xin
    He, Tian
    Li, Hao
    PROCESSES, 2025, 13 (02)
  • [49] An integration of geospatial and machine learning techniques for mapping groundwater potential: a case study of the Shipra river basin, India
    Patidar R.
    Pingale S.M.
    Khare D.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [50] Data-driven Seeing Prediction for Optics Telescope: from Statistical Modeling, Machine Learning to Deep Learning Techniques
    Wei-Jian Ni
    Quan-Le Shen
    Qing-Tian Zeng
    Huai-Qing Wang
    Xiang-Qun Cui
    Tong Liu
    ResearchinAstronomyandAstrophysics, 2022, 22 (12) : 155 - 168