Advanced machine vision techniques for groundwater level prediction modeling geospatial and statistical research

被引:2
|
作者
Xianglin, Dai [1 ]
Tariq, Aqil [2 ]
Jamil, Ahsan [3 ]
Aslam, Rana Waqar [4 ]
Zafar, Zeeshan [5 ]
Bailek, Nadjem [2 ,6 ,7 ]
Zhran, Mohamed [3 ,8 ]
Almutairi, Khalid F. [9 ]
Soufan, Walid [9 ]
机构
[1] Huanghuai Univ, Sch Intelligent Mfg, Zhumadian 463000, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Forest Resources, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
[3] New Mex State Univ, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, 3170S Espina Str, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying, Mapping & Remote Sensing, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[6] Ahmed Draia Adrar Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Lab Math Modeling & Applicat, Adrar, Algeria
[7] Middle East Univ, MEU Res Unit, Amman, Jordan
[8] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Publ Works Engn Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[9] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Plant Prod Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Comparative Statistical Modeling; Machine vision; ROC Curve Analysis; Earth observation techniques; Groundwater potential zones; Multi- Spectral satellite imagery; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.018
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This study utilizes three models, namely Weight of Evidence (WOE), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Index of Vulnerability (IV), to identify groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) in southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Nowshera District, Pakistan. We incorporated a total of twelve variables, encompassing elevation, slope, distance to the rivers, rainfall, curvature, drainage density, land use/land cover, topographic wetness index, height above the nearest drainage, NDVI, distance to the roads, and soil type, utilizing ArcGIS 10.8. The AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) assessed the dependability of the models. GWPZ was categorized into five classifications: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The WOE model produced distributions of 10.14 % (262.09 km2), 19.58 % (506.00 km2), 26.75 % (691.10 km2), 27.10 % (700.18 km2), and 16.40 % (423.75 km2) respectively. The FR yielded 20.93 % (538.90 km2), 32.38 % (833.53 km2), 18.92 % (487.14 km2), 13.13 % (337.94 km2), and 14.61 % (376.07 km2). The IV model resulted in 14.41 % (372.46 km2), 17.17 % (443.67 km2), 29.01 % (749.52 km2), 25.85 % (667.97 km2), and 13.53 % (349.50 km2). The AUC-ROC for WOE, FR, and IV were 58.06%, 87.53%, and 84.98%, respectively. All models accurately defined the GWPZ, with the FR approach demonstrating notable potential. These findings provide vital information for managing groundwater resources and the design of metropolitan areas. Our developed methodology can be used in places with comparable characteristics. It is a valuable tool for policy- makers interested in sustainable groundwater management. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2652 / 2668
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of stem diameter and biomass at individual tree crown level with advanced machine learning techniques
    Malek, Salim
    Miglietta, Franco
    Gobakken, Terje
    Naesset, Erik
    Gianelle, Damiano
    Dalponte, Michele
    IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2019, 12 : 323 - 329
  • [22] Prediction of water quality and LULC analysis using machine learning and geospatial techniques
    Kaur, Komalpreet
    Singh, Kanwarpreet
    Gupta, Sushindra Kumar
    Tiwary, Aditya Kumar
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01) : 275 - 294
  • [23] Detection of the tiredness level of drivers using machine vision techniques
    Jimenez, Robinson
    Prieto, Flavio
    Grisales, Victor H.
    2011 IEEE ELECTRONICS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMOTIVE MECHANICS CONFERENCE (CERMA 2011), 2011, : 97 - 102
  • [24] Machine Learning and Statistical Techniques for Daily Wind Energy Prediction
    Wickramasinghe, Lasini
    Ekanayake, Piyal
    Jayasinghe, Jeevani
    GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2022, 35 (04): : 1359 - 1370
  • [25] Enhancing groundwater quality prediction through ensemble machine learning techniques
    Karimi, Hadi
    Sahour, Soheil
    Khanbeyki, Matin
    Gholami, Vahid
    Sahour, Hossein
    Shahabi-Ghahfarokhi, Sina
    Mohammadi, Mohsen
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 197 (01)
  • [26] Machine Vision based Statistical Process Control in Fused Deposition Modeling
    Wu Yi
    He Ketai
    Zhou Xiaomin
    Ding Wenying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 12TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2017, : 936 - 941
  • [27] STATISTICAL MODELING AND RESEARCH TECHNIQUES - GERMAN - GEBELEIN,H
    VONGUERA.HW
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1973, 21 (04) : 1014 - 1015
  • [28] Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility using Geospatial Techniques: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Statistical Models
    Raut, Subrata
    Dutta, Dipanwita
    Bera, Debarati
    Samanta, Rajeeb
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [29] Modeling of standardized groundwater index of Bihar using machine learning techniques
    Kumari, Shomya
    Kumar, Deepak
    Kumar, Manish
    Pande, Chaitanya B.
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2023, 130
  • [30] Groundwater Level Prediction Using Machine Learning and Geostatistical Interpolation Models
    Zowam, Fabian J.
    Milewski, Adam M.
    WATER, 2024, 16 (19)