Advanced machine vision techniques for groundwater level prediction modeling geospatial and statistical research

被引:2
|
作者
Xianglin, Dai [1 ]
Tariq, Aqil [2 ]
Jamil, Ahsan [3 ]
Aslam, Rana Waqar [4 ]
Zafar, Zeeshan [5 ]
Bailek, Nadjem [2 ,6 ,7 ]
Zhran, Mohamed [3 ,8 ]
Almutairi, Khalid F. [9 ]
Soufan, Walid [9 ]
机构
[1] Huanghuai Univ, Sch Intelligent Mfg, Zhumadian 463000, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Forest Resources, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
[3] New Mex State Univ, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, 3170S Espina Str, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying, Mapping & Remote Sensing, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[6] Ahmed Draia Adrar Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Lab Math Modeling & Applicat, Adrar, Algeria
[7] Middle East Univ, MEU Res Unit, Amman, Jordan
[8] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Publ Works Engn Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[9] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Plant Prod Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Comparative Statistical Modeling; Machine vision; ROC Curve Analysis; Earth observation techniques; Groundwater potential zones; Multi- Spectral satellite imagery; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.018
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This study utilizes three models, namely Weight of Evidence (WOE), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Index of Vulnerability (IV), to identify groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) in southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Nowshera District, Pakistan. We incorporated a total of twelve variables, encompassing elevation, slope, distance to the rivers, rainfall, curvature, drainage density, land use/land cover, topographic wetness index, height above the nearest drainage, NDVI, distance to the roads, and soil type, utilizing ArcGIS 10.8. The AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) assessed the dependability of the models. GWPZ was categorized into five classifications: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The WOE model produced distributions of 10.14 % (262.09 km2), 19.58 % (506.00 km2), 26.75 % (691.10 km2), 27.10 % (700.18 km2), and 16.40 % (423.75 km2) respectively. The FR yielded 20.93 % (538.90 km2), 32.38 % (833.53 km2), 18.92 % (487.14 km2), 13.13 % (337.94 km2), and 14.61 % (376.07 km2). The IV model resulted in 14.41 % (372.46 km2), 17.17 % (443.67 km2), 29.01 % (749.52 km2), 25.85 % (667.97 km2), and 13.53 % (349.50 km2). The AUC-ROC for WOE, FR, and IV were 58.06%, 87.53%, and 84.98%, respectively. All models accurately defined the GWPZ, with the FR approach demonstrating notable potential. These findings provide vital information for managing groundwater resources and the design of metropolitan areas. Our developed methodology can be used in places with comparable characteristics. It is a valuable tool for policy- makers interested in sustainable groundwater management. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2652 / 2668
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usage of statistical modeling techniques in surface and groundwater level prediction
    Kenda, Klemen
    Peternelj, Joze
    Mellios, Nikos
    Kofinas, Dimitris
    Cerin, Matej
    Rozanec, Joze
    JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2020, 69 (03): : 248 - 265
  • [2] Integrated geophysical and geospatial techniques for surface and groundwater modeling
    Khan, Ali Yousaf
    Ullah, Waheed
    Niaz, Abrar
    Bibi, Tehmina
    Imtiaz, Muhammad Mubashar
    Fiaz, Rashida
    Gul, Shehla
    Hameed, Kiran
    Islam, Fakhrul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] Assessment and Prediction of Groundwater using Geospatial and ANN Modeling
    Dadhich, Ankita P.
    Goyal, Rohit
    Dadhich, Pran N.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (09) : 2879 - 2893
  • [4] Assessment and Prediction of Groundwater using Geospatial and ANN Modeling
    Ankita P. Dadhich
    Rohit Goyal
    Pran N. Dadhich
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 2879 - 2893
  • [5] Application of Machine Learning and Geospatial Techniques for Groundwater Potential Mapping
    Rajarshi Saha
    Nikhil Kumar Baranval
    Iswar Chandra Das
    Vinod Kumar Kumaranchat
    K. Satyanarayana Reddy
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2022, 50 : 1995 - 2010
  • [6] Application of Machine Learning and Geospatial Techniques for Groundwater Potential Mapping
    Saha, Rajarshi
    Baranval, Nikhil Kumar
    Das, Iswar Chandra
    Kumaranchat, Vinod Kumar
    Reddy, K. Satyanarayana
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 50 (10) : 1995 - 2010
  • [7] Popularity prediction of movies: from statistical modeling to machine learning techniques
    Syed Muhammad Raza Abidi
    Yonglin Xu
    Jianyue Ni
    Xiangmeng Wang
    Wu Zhang
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020, 79 : 35583 - 35617
  • [8] Popularity prediction of movies: from statistical modeling to machine learning techniques
    Abidi, Syed Muhammad Raza
    Xu, Yonglin
    Ni, Jianyue
    Wang, Xiangmeng
    Zhang, Wu
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 79 (47-48) : 35583 - 35617
  • [9] Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling
    Goetz, J. N.
    Brenning, A.
    Petschko, H.
    Leopold, P.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 81 : 1 - 11
  • [10] Groundwater Arsenic Distribution in India by Machine Learning Geospatial Modeling
    Podgorski, Joel
    Wu, Ruohan
    Chakravorty, Biswajit
    Polya, David A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 17