Clinical trials in neuromodulatory treatment of drug-resistant hypertension and the need for spinal cord stimulation trials: a PRISMA systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Thrash, Garrett W. [1 ]
Wang, Elijah [1 ]
Sun, Yifei [1 ]
Walker, Harrison C. [2 ,3 ]
Shirvalkar, Prasad [4 ]
Becker, Bryan K. [5 ]
Holland, Marshall T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 5663 Post Oak Trl, Bessemer, Birmingham, 35022, AL
[2] Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
[3] Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
[4] Departments of Anesthesiology (Pain Medicine), Neurological Surgery and Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
[5] Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
关键词
Carotid Body Stimulation; Drug resistant Hypertension; Hypertension; Neuromodulation; Neurosurgery; Renal Denervation; SCS; Spinal Cord Stimulation;
D O I
10.1186/s42234-024-00160-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Drug-resistant hypertension affects approximately 9–18% of the United States hypertensive population. Recognized as hypertension that is resistant to three or more medications, drug-resistant hypertension can lead to fatal sequelae, such as heart failure, aortic dissection, and other vast systemic disease. The disruption of the homeostatic mechanisms that stabilize blood pressure can be treated procedurally when medication fails. These procedures include carotid body stimulation, renal denervation, sympathectomies, dorsal root ganglia stimulation, and more recently spinal cord stimulation and have all been utilized in the treatment of drug-resistant hypertension. Methods: To identify the clinical trials of neuromodulation in drug-resistant hypertension, a PubMed search was performed that included all original clinical trials of neuromodulation treating drug-resistant hypertension. The 838 articles found were sorted using Covidence to find 33 unique primary clinical trials. There were no methods used to assess risk of bias as a meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity. Results: Renal denervation and carotid body stimulation have both shown promising results with multiple clinical trials, while sympathectomies have mostly been retired due to the irreversible adverse effects caused. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation showed varying success rates. Spinal cord stimulation is a novel treatment of drug-resistant hypertension that shows promising initial results but requires further investigation and prospective studies of the treatment to provide guidelines for future DRH treatment. The limitations of the review are reporting bias and absence of a meta-analysis that compares the treatment modality due to the heterogeneity of reported outcomes. Conclusion: Innovation in neuromodulation is necessary to provide alternative avenues of treatment in the face of contraindications for standard treatment. Treatment of drug-resistant hypertension is essential to delay dangerous sequelae. This review’s objective is to summarize the clinical trials for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension following PRISMA guidelines and suggests future directions in the treatment of drug-resistant hypertension. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Effectiveness and Mechanism of Action of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treating Chronic Low Back and Lower Extremity Pain: a Systematic Review
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Gupta, Ashim
    Cedeno, David L.
    Vallejo, Alejandro
    Smith, William J.
    Thomas, Samuel M.
    Benyamin, Ramsin
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2020, 24 (11)
  • [42] Evidence of treating spasticity before it develops: a systematic review of spasticity outcomes in acute spinal cord injury interventional trials
    Stampas, Argyrios
    Hook, Michelle
    Korupolu, Radha
    Jethani, Lavina
    Kaner, Mahmut T.
    Pemberton, Erinn
    Li, Sheng
    Francisco, Gerard E.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, 2022, 15
  • [43] Clinical Effectiveness and Mechanism of Action of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treating Chronic Low Back and Lower Extremity Pain: a Systematic Review
    Ricardo Vallejo
    Ashim Gupta
    David L. Cedeno
    Alejandro Vallejo
    William J. Smith
    Samuel M. Thomas
    Ramsin Benyamin
    Alan D. Kaye
    Laxmaiah Manchikanti
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2020, 24
  • [44] Is drug treatment of hypertension in clinical practice as effective as in randomized controlled trials with regard to the reduction of the incidence of stroke?
    Klungel, OH
    Stricker, BHC
    Breteler, MMB
    Seidell, JC
    Psaty, BM
    de Boer, A
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (03) : 339 - 344
  • [45] Letter to the editor: Hidden influence? Unmasking conflicts of interest from randomized clinical trials on spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain
    Hans, Guy Henri
    Bernaerts, Lisa
    Roelant, Ella
    Moens, Maarten
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [46] Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Marin-Castaneda, Luis A.
    Gonzalez-Salido, Jimena
    Martinez-Juarez, Iris E.
    Palomera-Garfias, Nadia
    Flores, Brandon
    Munoz-Guerrero, Daniela
    Alavez, Gerson Angel
    Aispuro, Geronimo Pacheco
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2025,
  • [47] Utilizing Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: An Assessment of Clinical Trials from the National ClinicalTrials.gov Database
    Abraham, Mickey E.
    Shalom, Moshe
    Gendreau, Julian
    Gold, Justin
    Pierzchajlo, Garret
    Pierzchajlo, Noah
    Chakravarti, Sachiv
    Sahyouni, Ronald
    Murthy, Nikhil
    Ciacci, Joseph
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 177 : E361 - E367
  • [48] Research design considerations for randomized controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation for pain: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials/Institute of Neuromodulation/International Neuromodulation Society recommendations
    Katz, Nathaniel
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    North, Richard
    Thomson, Simon
    Eldabe, Sam
    Hayek, Salim M.
    Kopell, Brian H.
    Markman, John
    Rezai, Ali
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Buchser, Eric
    Fields, Howard
    Fiore, Gregory
    Ferguson, McKenzie
    Gewandter, Jennifer
    Hilker, Chris
    Jain, Roshini
    Leitner, Angela
    Loeser, John
    McNicol, Ewan
    Nurmikko, Turo
    Shipley, Jane
    Singh, Rahul
    Trescot, Andrea
    van Dongen, Robert
    Venkatesan, Lalit
    PAIN, 2021, 162 (07) : 1935 - 1956
  • [49] Response to letter to the editor: Hidden influence? Unmasking conflicts of interest from randomized clinical trials on spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain
    D'Souza, Ryan S.
    Klasova, Johana
    Hussain, Nasir
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [50] Differences in calculated percentage improvement versus patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scores: a review of spinal cord stimulation trials
    Hagedorn, Jonathan M.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Canzanello, Nicholas C.
    Covington, Stephen M.
    Schroeder, Darrell R.
    Bendel, Markus A.
    Moeschler, Susan M.
    Hooten, W. Michael
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (04) : 293 - 297