Practice-based clinical evaluation of dental implants placed with immediate or delayed loading protocols: One-year follow-up

被引:1
作者
de Oliveira Lopes A.C. [1 ]
Coelho P.G. [2 ]
de Carvalho P.S.P. [3 ]
Bonjardim L.R. [4 ]
Neppelenbroek K.H. [1 ]
Jalkh E.B.B. [1 ]
Zahoui A. [1 ]
Bonfante E.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, 17.012-901, SP
[2] Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, 10010, NY
[3] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, 17.012-901, SP
[4] Department of Biological Sciences, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, 17.012-901, SP
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Bone remodeling; Delayed implants; Dental implant; Immediate loading; Practice-based research;
D O I
10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019031911
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluate bone remodeling and prostheses survival of immediately provisionalized with occlusal loading and delayed loading (DL) single implants placed in the posterior region after 1-yr follow-up in dental practic-es. Included in the study are patients selected to receive one regular implant (4 × 10 mm) for single tooth replacement in healed ridge sockets in the mandible and maxilla. Implants are immediately loaded or delayed functionally loaded with metal ceramic crowns, depending on peak insertion torque value. All implants are clinically and radiographically evaluated at T1, immediately postoperatively; T2, 60 d; T3, 180 d; and T4, 360 d. Measurements between implant platform and top of alveolar bone crest at distal and mesial areas are performed using periapical radiographs. Data are statistically evaluated through two-way repeated measures of analysis of variance following post hoc comparisons using the Tukey test (p < 0.05). Ten specialists working in ten different practices treat 36 patients who receive one implant each with internal conical connection (hybrid implant system, 4 × 10 mm) (Emfils; Itu, Brazil). Results show that bone-level alterations in immediate (IM; 0.56 mm; confidence interval [CI]: ± 0.21 mm) and delayed (0.65 mm; CI: ± 0.19 mm) groups are not significantly different (p = 0.515) during the course of the 1-yr observation period. In both groups, statistically significant progressive bone-level remodeling occurs through the evaluated follow-up time points (p < 0.047). All prostheses are rated “alpha,” presenting 100% success at 1-yr follow-up. The loading method does not influence bone-remodeling levels around IM or DL at the posterior region after 1-yr follow-up. No prostheses complications are reported. © 2019 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
da Silva J.D., Kazimiroff J., Papas A., Curro F.A., Thomp-Son V.P., Vena D.A., Wu H., Collie D., Craig R.G., Outcomes of implants and restorations placed in general dental prac-tices: A retrospective study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network, J am Dental Assoc., 145, 7, pp. 704-713, (2014)
[12]  
Papaspyridakos P., Implant success rates for single crowns and fixed partial dentures in general dental practices may be lower than those achieved in well-controlled university or specialty settings, J Evid Based Dent Pract, 15, 1, pp. 30-32, (2015)
[13]  
Pessoa R.S., Sousa R.M., Pereira L.M., Neves F.D., Bezerra F.J., Jaecques S.V., Sloten J.V., Quirynen M., Teughels W., Spin-Neto R., Bone remodeling around implants with external hexagon and morse-taper connections: A randomized, con-trolled, split-mouth, clinical trial, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19, 1, pp. 97-110, (2017)
[14]  
Cvar J.F., Ryge G., Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971, Clin Oral Inves-Tigat, 9, 4, pp. 215-232, (2005)
[15]  
Den Hartog L., Raghoebar G.M., Stellingsma K., Vissink A., Meijer H.J., Immediate non-occlusal loading of single implants in the aesthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial, J Clin Periodontol, 38, 2, pp. 186-194, (2011)
[16]  
Degidi M., Nardi D., Piattelli A., Immediate versus one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: A 3-year randomized clinical trial, J Periodontol, 80, 9, pp. 1393-1398, (2009)
[17]  
Benic G.I., Mir-Mari J., Hammerle C.H., Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: A systematic review and me-me-ta-analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants., 29, pp. 222-238, (2014)
[18]  
Laurell L., Lundgren D., Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: A meta-analysis, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 13, 1, pp. 19-28, (2011)
[19]  
Den Hartog L., Slater J.J., Vissink A., Meijer H.J., Raghoe-Bar G.M., Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction, J Clin Periodontol, 35, 12, pp. 1073-1086, (2008)
[20]  
Gjelvold B., Kisch J., Chrcanovic B.R., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A., Clinical and radiographic outcome following immediate loading and delayed loading of single-tooth implants: Randomized clinical trial, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19, 3, pp. 549-558, (2017)