Practice-based clinical evaluation of dental implants placed with immediate or delayed loading protocols: One-year follow-up

被引:1
作者
de Oliveira Lopes A.C. [1 ]
Coelho P.G. [2 ]
de Carvalho P.S.P. [3 ]
Bonjardim L.R. [4 ]
Neppelenbroek K.H. [1 ]
Jalkh E.B.B. [1 ]
Zahoui A. [1 ]
Bonfante E.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, 17.012-901, SP
[2] Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, 10010, NY
[3] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, 17.012-901, SP
[4] Department of Biological Sciences, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, 17.012-901, SP
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Bone remodeling; Delayed implants; Dental implant; Immediate loading; Practice-based research;
D O I
10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019031911
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluate bone remodeling and prostheses survival of immediately provisionalized with occlusal loading and delayed loading (DL) single implants placed in the posterior region after 1-yr follow-up in dental practic-es. Included in the study are patients selected to receive one regular implant (4 × 10 mm) for single tooth replacement in healed ridge sockets in the mandible and maxilla. Implants are immediately loaded or delayed functionally loaded with metal ceramic crowns, depending on peak insertion torque value. All implants are clinically and radiographically evaluated at T1, immediately postoperatively; T2, 60 d; T3, 180 d; and T4, 360 d. Measurements between implant platform and top of alveolar bone crest at distal and mesial areas are performed using periapical radiographs. Data are statistically evaluated through two-way repeated measures of analysis of variance following post hoc comparisons using the Tukey test (p < 0.05). Ten specialists working in ten different practices treat 36 patients who receive one implant each with internal conical connection (hybrid implant system, 4 × 10 mm) (Emfils; Itu, Brazil). Results show that bone-level alterations in immediate (IM; 0.56 mm; confidence interval [CI]: ± 0.21 mm) and delayed (0.65 mm; CI: ± 0.19 mm) groups are not significantly different (p = 0.515) during the course of the 1-yr observation period. In both groups, statistically significant progressive bone-level remodeling occurs through the evaluated follow-up time points (p < 0.047). All prostheses are rated “alpha,” presenting 100% success at 1-yr follow-up. The loading method does not influence bone-remodeling levels around IM or DL at the posterior region after 1-yr follow-up. No prostheses complications are reported. © 2019 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Zarandi A., Novin M., Marginal bone loss around platform-switched and non-platform switched implants after two years of placement: A clinical trial, J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 11, 1, pp. 26-29, (2017)
[2]  
Yan Q., Xiao L.Q., Su M.Y., Mei Y., Shi B., Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate placement or immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 31, 6, pp. 1327-1340, (2016)
[3]  
Mangano F.G., Shibli J.A., Sammons R.L., Iaculli F., Piattelli A., Mangano C., Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: A prospective clinical study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up, Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, 8, pp. 933-940, (2014)
[4]  
Raes F., Eccellente T., Lenzi C., Ortolani M., Luongo G., Mangano C., Mangano M., Immediate functional loading of single implants: A multicenter study with 4 years of fol-low-up, J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 12, 1, pp. 26-37, (2018)
[5]  
Kim T.H., Knezevic A., Jorgensen M., Rich S., Nowzari H., Prospective, 1-year observational study of double-thread-ed tapered body dental implants with immediate loading, J Prosthet Dent, 114, 1, pp. 46-51, (2015)
[6]  
Esposito M., Grusovin M.G., Maghaireh H., Worthington H.V., Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different times for loading dental implants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 3, (2013)
[7]  
Suarez F., Chan H.L., Monje A., Galindo-Moreno P., Wang H.L., Effect of the timing of restoration on implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review, J Periodontol, 84, 2, pp. 159-169, (2013)
[8]  
Pigozzo M.N., Rebelo da Costa T., Sesma N., Lagana D.C., Immediate versus early loading of single dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Prosthet Dent, 120, 1, pp. 25-34, (2018)
[9]  
Cardaropoli G., Wennstrom J.L., Lekholm U., Peri-im-plant bone alterations in relation to inter-unit distances. A 3-year retrospective study, Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, 4, pp. 430-436, (2003)
[10]  
Albrektsson T., Zarb G., Worthington P., Eriksson A., The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success, Int J Oral Maxillo-Fac Implants, 1, 1, pp. 11-25, (1986)