A distribution linguistic group decision-making method considering twin multiplicative data envelopment analysis regret-rejoice cross-efficiency

被引:0
作者
Liu, Jinpei [1 ]
Shui, Tianqi [1 ]
Shao, Longlong [2 ]
Jin, Feifei [1 ]
Zhou, Ligang [3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Business, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Sch Big Data & Stat, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision making; Distribution linguistic preference relations; Data envelopment analysis; Regret theory; Individual tolerance; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; CONSISTENCY; MODEL; DEA; RISK; SETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109592
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Traditional approaches to group decision-making (GDM) often assume that decision-makers (DMs) are perfectly rational, which neglects the psychological attitudes exhibited by DMs during the decision-making process. To address this issue, this paper designs a novel method for GDM with multiplicative distribution linguistic preference relations (MDLPRs), which incorporates twin multiplicative data envelopment analysis (TMDEA) regretrejoice cross-efficiency models and a weighting model with individual tolerance. Firstly, we provide a clear definition of MDLPRs based on multiplicative linguistic terms that capture the asymmetrical qualitative recognition of DMs. Then, a weighting model is constructed to obtain DM's weights. This model assumes that DMs are boundedly rational and have a certain tolerance level for group consensus measurement. Subsequently, TMDEA cross-efficiency models are developed based on different perspectives. On this basis, we further propose TMDEA regret-rejoice cross-efficiency models that consider the psychological risks of DMs. Furthermore, the method for GDM based on TMDEA regret-rejoice cross-efficiency models and individual tolerance with MDLPRs is given. Finally, we present a case study of the selection of the Ya'an ecological monitoring station in China to test the validity and applicability of the proposed method. The merits and robustness of the constructed method are highlighted by sensitive analysis and comparative analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   2-Tuple unbalanced linguistic multiple-criteria group decision-making using prospect theory data envelopment analysis [J].
Imran Khan ;
Anjana Gupta ;
Aparna Mehra .
Soft Computing, 2022, 26 :6317-6332
[42]   A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (01) :239-250
[43]   Multiple stage optimization driven group decision making method with interval linguistic fuzzy preference relations based on ordinal consistency and DEA cross-efficiency [J].
Liu, Jinpei ;
Qiang, Zijie ;
Wu, Peng ;
Du, Pengcheng .
FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 22 (02) :309-336
[44]   Bid evaluation decision for major project based on analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency model [J].
Zhao, Liang ;
Liu, Weiguo ;
Wu, Yong .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2020, 11 (09) :3639-3647
[45]   Multiple stage optimization driven group decision making method with interval linguistic fuzzy preference relations based on ordinal consistency and DEA cross-efficiency [J].
Jinpei Liu ;
Zijie Qiang ;
Peng Wu ;
Pengcheng Du .
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2023, 22 :309-336
[46]   Multiplicative Consistency and DEA Cross-Efficiency-Driven Decision-Making Method with Fuzzy Preference Relations [J].
Jin, Feifei ;
Cai, Yuhang ;
Zhou, Ligang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 25 (02) :601-619
[47]   An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs [J].
Yang, Min ;
Li, Yongjun ;
Chen, Ya ;
Liang, Liang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 239 (02) :479-489
[48]   An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method with Hesitant Qualitative Information Based on DEA Cross-Efficiency and Priority Aggregation for Evaluating Factors Affecting a Resilient City [J].
Wu, Peng ;
Liu, Jinpei ;
Zhou, Ligang ;
Chen, Huayou .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2022, 31 (02) :293-316
[49]   On a Choquet Integral DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Involving the Satisfaction of Decision-Making Units and Weight Balance of Indicators [J].
Zhao, Yizhao ;
Gong, Zaiwu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2023, 16 (01)
[50]   On a Choquet Integral DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Involving the Satisfaction of Decision-Making Units and Weight Balance of Indicators [J].
Yizhao Zhao ;
Zaiwu Gong .
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 16