Role of turbulence on high-speed aeroelastic behavior of a cantilever plate

被引:0
作者
Thayer, Jordan D. [1 ]
Kronheimer, Matthew J. [1 ]
Deshmukh, Rohit [2 ]
McNamara, Jack J. [1 ]
Gaitonde, Datta, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Ocean & Mech Engn, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
关键词
Fluid-structure interaction; Turbulence; Shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction; Panel flutter; BOUNDARY-LAYER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104231
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Accurate and efficient prediction of high-speed aeroelastic behavior is greatly hampered by insufficient understanding of the role of multi-scale fluid features on structural dynamics. In this work, we use a combination of scale-resolving and modeled simulations to evaluate the significance of capturing coupling with the broadband turbulent pressure fluctuations on prediction of the aeroelastic response. A Mach 2 turbulent flow separating from a cantilever plate is considered at nondimensional dynamic pressures of lambda = 100 and 150. The fully coupled Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) predict sustained oscillations, with larger amplitudes and modal coalescence for the higher lambda and shock-induced separation on the cantilever top surface. The significance of capturing dynamic feedback between the broadband turbulence and structural compliance is highlighted through aeroelastic response prediction comparisons between LES and URANS. Here, wall pressure fluctuations are extracted from LES data about undeformed and time-mean deflected states of the cantilever and separately added to coupled URANS simulations. The results indicate that key aspects of the aeroelastic behavior can be recovered by URANS in conjunction with an uncoupled turbulent load. However, clear differences in response frequency and instantaneous amplitude remain present compared to LES, suggesting missing coupled phenomena from the URANS prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Synthetic generation of equilibrium boundary layer turbulence from modeled statistics
    Adler, Michael C.
    Gonzalez, David R.
    Stack, Cory M.
    Gaitonde, Datta V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2018, 165 : 127 - 143
  • [2] The effects of expansion on the turbulence structure of compressible boundary layers
    Arnette, SA
    Samimy, M
    Elliott, GS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1998, 367 : 67 - 105
  • [3] Bartels R.E., 2006, NASA/TM-2006-214301, P1
  • [4] IMPLICIT FACTORED SCHEME FOR COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS
    BEAM, RM
    WARMING, RF
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1978, 16 (04) : 393 - 402
  • [5] Wall pressure fluctuations beneath supersonic turbulent boundary layers
    Bernardini, Matteo
    Pirozzoli, Sergio
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2011, 23 (08)
  • [6] Fluid/Structure Interaction of Cantilevered Plate in Supersonic Separated Flow
    Bojan, Griffin K.
    Dutton, J. Craig
    Elliott, Gregory S.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (12) : 6726 - 6738
  • [7] Features of panel flutter response to shock boundary layer interactions
    Boyer, Nathan R.
    McNamara, J. J.
    Gaitonde, D. V.
    Barnes, Caleb J.
    Visbal, Miguel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 101
  • [8] Experiments on a Thin Panel Excited by Turbulent Flow and Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    Perez, Ricardo A.
    Beberniss, Timothy J.
    Spottswood, S. Michael
    Ehrhardt, David A.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (07) : 2737 - 2752
  • [9] Brunton S.L., 2017, Data Driven Science and Engineering-Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control, Vfirst, P1
  • [10] Currao G., 2016, 15 DYNAMICS SPECIAL, P1, DOI [10.2514/6.2016-1088, DOI 10.2514/6.2016-1088]