Life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic analysis of two-stage anaerobic process of co-digesting palm oil mill effluent (POME) with concentrated latex wastewater (CLW) for biogas production

被引:2
作者
Raketh, Marisa [1 ]
Kongjan, Prawit [1 ,2 ]
O-Thong, Sompong [3 ]
Mamimin, Chonticha [4 ]
Jariyaboon, Rattana [1 ,2 ]
Promnuan, Kanathip [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ PSU, Fac Sci & Technol, Biomass Convers Energy & Chem BioMEC Res Unit, Pattani 94000, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ PSU, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Sci, Pattani 94000, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Biofuel & Biocatalysis Innovat Res Unit, Nakhonsawan Campus, Nakhon Sawan 60130, Thailand
[4] Bio4gas Thailand Co Ltd, Phatthalung 93210, Thailand
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Economic analysis; Co-digesting; Palm oil mill effluent; Concentrated latex wastewater; TECHNOLOGIES; MITIGATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.079
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study outlines the results of a process-based life cycle assessment (LCA) of the environmental performance of biogas production from co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and concentrated latex wastewater (CLW) in the two-stage anaerobic digestion (AD) process. Biogas is utilized global across several sectors, including electricity generation, heating, and transportation. The Open LCA 2.0.2 software was used to evaluate the LCA at the midpoint level by using 18 different impact categories. This study reveals the three main contributions of the AD process, which were global warming (8.65 x 102 kg CO2eq), water consumption (5.32 m3), and land use change (3.39 x 102 m2 a crop eq), this result corresponded with the previous study in Malaysia that examined biogas production from the AD of POME In addition, alternative scenarios, in which a single substrate, have been established to quantify the impacts of potential improvements of biogas production to compare with base scenario of co-digestion. The results show that the environmental impacts of the base scenario released were lower than those of the single POME substrate of alternative scenario 1 in most impact categories. Furthermore, economic analysis is a crucial factor in the practical implementation of the AD process. Linking LCA with economic analysis offers a comprehensive perspective on sustainability, balancing environmental impacts with financial performance to optimize the potential of the AD co-digestion process. This is the first study to apply LCA and economic analysis to this specific co-digestion process in a two-stage AD system. The economic analysis of the two-stage AD of co-digesting POME and CLW was 1200 m3/d production of wastewater (70% of POME and 30 % of CLW) based on the factories' data. The result indicates net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period of 515,813.94 USD, 9.13%, and 8.87 years, respectively. This work proposed the potential approach for implementing the two-stage AD co-digestion of POME and CLW while concurrently producing valuable bioenergy carriers.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 459
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Abas R., 2013, OIL PALM IND EC J, V13, P14
  • [2] Life cycle analysis of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent
    Aziz, Nur Izzah Hamna A.
    Hanafiah, Marlia M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 (145) : 847 - 857
  • [3] Mitigation strategies in the agro-food sector: The anaerobic digestion of tomato puree by-products. An Italian case study
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Duca, Daniele
    Negri, Marco
    Fusi, Alessandra
    Fiala, Marco
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 526 : 88 - 97
  • [4] Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: Impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Negri, Marco
    Fiala, Marco
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 463 : 541 - 551
  • [5] A comparative assessment of anaerobic digestion power plants as alternative to lagoons for vinasse treatment: life cycle assessment and exergy analysis
    Barrera, Ernesto L.
    Rosa, Elena
    Spanjers, Henri
    Romero, Osvaldo
    De Meester, Steven
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 : 459 - 471
  • [6] Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization
    Chen, Shaoqing
    Chen, Bin
    Song, Dan
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 114 : 357 - 364
  • [7] ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA - A new open source software for Life Cycle Assessment
    Ciroth, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (04) : 209 - 210
  • [8] Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe
    Hijazi, O.
    Munro, S.
    Zerhusen, B.
    Effenberger, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 : 1291 - 1300
  • [9] ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Steinmann, Zoran J. N.
    Elshout, Pieter M. F.
    Stam, Gea
    Verones, Francesca
    Vieira, Marisa
    Zijp, Michiel
    Hollander, Anne
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02) : 138 - 147
  • [10] Ioannou-Ttofa L., 2021, Dig. Valoriz. Biofertil. J. Clean. Prod., V286