Urban public transport system resilience evaluation based on a system function curve

被引:0
作者
Chen C. [1 ]
He F. [1 ]
Zhao D. [1 ]
Xie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Disaster Prevention Science and Safety Technology, Central South University, Changsha
来源
Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University | 2022年 / 62卷 / 06期
关键词
Resilience evaluation; System function curve; Transport system resilience; Urban public transport;
D O I
10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2022.22.025
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The resilience of the urban public transport systems was evaluated using a system function curve model to quantify the urban public transport system resilience. The model included the bus and taxi systems with the bus service rate and the taxi online rate used as the system function to evaluate the urban public transport system resilience. This method was then used to evaluate the resilience of the public transport system during the Zhengzhou storm and flooding in 2021. The results show that the Zhengzhou public transport system is moderately resilient and various recovery schemes could affect the recovery capacity and adaptability of the system. The model describes the system functions in stages from the initial disturbance to a new equilibrium state to calculate the urban public transport system resilience. This method is suitable for single disasters and multiple, coupled disasters and can provide guidance for improving the ability of urban public transport systems to deal with unknown disruptions. © 2022, Tsinghua University Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1022
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Notification of recent severe convective weather response and disposal work
[2]  
Tenth Henan Flood Control and Disaster Relief Press Conference
[3]  
DUY P N, CHAPMAN L, TIGHT M, Et al., Increasing vulnerability to floods in new development areas: Evidence from Ho Chi Minh City, International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 10, 1, pp. 197-212, (2018)
[4]  
ZHANG L J., Study on the resilience measurement of the flooding disaster in urban road transportation system, (2020)
[5]  
MURRAY-TUITE P M., A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1398-1405, (2006)
[6]  
CHAN R, SCHOFER J L., Measuring transportation system resilience: Response of rail transit to weather disruptions, Natural Hazards Review, 17, 1, (2016)
[7]  
DUY P N, CHAPMAN L, TIGHT M., Resilient transport systems to reduce urban vulnerability to floods in emerging-coastal cities: A case study of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Travel Behaviour and Society, 15, pp. 28-43, (2019)
[8]  
WANG J, LIU H T, ZHU J M., Study on road network recovery under snow and ice conditions based on the perspective of resilient city, Chinese Journal of Management Science, 26, 3, pp. 177-187, (2018)
[9]  
HUA Z Y., Resilience thinking, resilient infrastructure and cities' operation safety, Shanghai Urban Management, 30, 1, pp. 19-26, (2021)
[10]  
AYDIN N Y, DUZGUN H S, WENZEL F, Et al., Integration of stress testing with graph theory to assess the resilience of urban road networks under seismic hazards, Natural Hazards, 91, 1, pp. 37-68, (2018)