Assessment of alternative industrial robots using AHP and TOPSIS

被引：0

作者：

Rehman, Ateekh Ur ^{[1
]}

Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Industrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421

[2] FARCAMT, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421

来源：

International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering | 2013年 / 15卷 / 04期

关键词：

AHP; Analytic hierarchy process; Industrial robot; Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution; TOPSIS;

D O I：

10.1504/IJISE.2013.057481

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

An ever increasing trend in present dynamic markets, the industrial organisations should provide the right amount of flexibility at right time in the right direction. Among many manufacturing strategies available, use of advance industrial robot technology is emerging as an attractive alternative. Although, the successful implementation of advance industrial robot offers manufacturing organisations numerous benefits, the assessment and preference of these technologies is a very versatile task due to the multiple parameters involved. The objective here is to help decision makers to ensure that the selected industrial robot comply with the objective of the organisation. Thus, the paper mainly demonstrates and compares the ranking of the industrial robots using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). In the present study, the model presented takes into consideration the economic and technical criterion. Copyright © 2013 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

引用

页码：475 / 489

页数：14

共 32 条

[1]

Abdi M.R., Layout configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using the fuzzy AHP, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage., 17, 1-2, pp. 149-165, (2009)

[2]

Abdi M.R., Fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for evaluating reconfigurable machines, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 117, 1, pp. 1-15, (2009)

[3]

Arunkumar N., Karunamoorthy L., Muthukumar S., Multi-criteria supplier evaluation and selection using fuzzy AHP (alpha cut analysis): A case study, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 8, 4, pp. 449-471, (2011)

[4]

Arunkumar N., Karunamoorthy L., Muthukumar S., Supplier evaluation and selection for a manufacturing industry using analytical hierarchy process-A case study, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 8, 3, pp. 346-365, (2011)

[5]

Athawale V.M., Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S., Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking method, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 11, 1-2, pp. 3-15, (2012)

[6]

Barad M., Nof S.Y., CIM flexibility measures: A review and a framework for analysis and applicability assessment, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 10, 1, pp. 296-308, (1997)

[7]

Bargell M., Gabbrielli R., Dimensional analysis for investment selection in industrial robots, International Journal of Production Research, 37, 1, pp. 4151-4178, (2000)

[8]

Bhangale P.P., Saha S.K., Agrawal V.P., A dynamic model based robot arm selection criterion, Int. J. of Multibody System Dynamics, 12, 2, pp. 95-115, (2003)

[9]

Chakraborty S., Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54, 9-12, pp. 1155-1166, (2011)

[10]

Chatterjee P., Manikrao A.V., Chakraborty S., Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26, 5, pp. 483-489, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 →