Adverse staff health outcomes associated with endoscope reprocessing

被引:4
作者
Gutterman, Elane [1 ]
Jorgensen, Lindsay [1 ]
Mitchell, Amber [2 ]
Fua, Sherry [2 ]
机构
[1] LLC, Princeton Junction, NJ
[2] ASP/Johnson and Johnson, Irvine
关键词
21;
D O I
10.2345/0899-8205-47.2.172
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are occupational challenges associated with cleaning, disinfecting, storing, and transporting flexible endoscopes. Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has set standards to protect the safety of health workers in the United States, the standards are not specific to endoscope reprocessing, and the general standards that are in place are not fully implemented. Furthermore, adverse staff outcomes may not be fully preventable. To assess the evidence for adverse outcomes in staff associated with endoscope reprocessing, a literature review was performed in the PubMed database for articles on this topic published between Jan. 1, 2007 and March 7, 2012. Eight studies were identified, mainly European, which reported numerous adverse outcomes to healthcare personnel associated with endoscope reprocessing including respiratory ailments and physical discomfort. More scientifically rigorous studies are required to comprehensively describe adverse health outcomes in personnel engaged in reprocessing, particularly in the United States, and examine whether increased automation of the reprocessing process leads to decreased adverse health outcomes for staff. © Copyright AAMI 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 179
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Angtuaco T.L., Oprescu F.G., Lal S.K., Pennington J.H., Russell B.D., Co J.M., Et al., Universal precautions guideline: self-reported compliance by gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal endoscopy nurses-A decade's lack of progress, Am J Gastroenterol., 98, 11, pp. 2420-2423, (2003)
[2]  
Romano-Woodward D., Safe use of glutaraldehyde, Nursing Standard., 14, 32, pp. 47-51, (2000)
[3]  
Cohen N.L., Patton C.M., Worker safety and glutaraldehyde in the gastrointestinal lab environment, Gastroenterology Nursing., 29, 2, pp. 100-104, (2006)
[4]  
Rutala W.A., Weber D.J., Disinfection of endoscopes: Review of new chemical sterilants used for high-level disinfection, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol., 20, 1, pp. 69-76, (1999)
[5]  
Pechter E., Davis L.K., Tumpowsky C., Flattery J., Harrison R., Reinisch F., Et al., Work-related asthma among healthcare workers: Surveillance data from california, massachusetts, michigan, and New Jersey, 1993-1997, Am J Ind Med., 47, 3, pp. 265-275, (2005)
[6]  
Vyas A., Pickering C.A., Oldham L.A., Francis H.C., Fletcher A.M., Merrett T., Et al., Survey of symptoms, respiratory function, and immunology and their relation to glutaraldehyde and other occupational exposures among endoscopy nursing staff, Occup Environ Med., 57, 11, pp. 752-759, (2000)
[7]  
Seoane-Vazquez E., Rodriguez-Monguio R., Visaria J., Carlson A., Endoscopy-related infections and toxic reactions: An international comparison, Endoscopy., 39, 8, pp. 742-778, (2007)
[8]  
Miyajima K., Yoshida J., Kumagai S., Ortho-phthalaldehyde exposure levels among endoscope disinfection workers, Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi., 52, 2, (2010)
[9]  
Baudet J.S., Martin J.M., Sanchez-Del-Rio A., Aguirre-Jaime A., Occupational risk prevention in endoscopy units: A pending issue, Rev Esp Enferm Dig., 103, 2, pp. 83-88, (2011)
[10]  
Ofstead C.L., Wetzler H.P., Snyder A.K., Horton R.A., Endoscope reprocessing methods: A prospective study on the impact of human factors and automation, Gastroenterology Nursing., 33, 4, pp. 304-311, (2010)