Seismic fragility analysis of long-span bridges based on explicit time-domain method

被引:0
作者
Liu X.-L. [1 ]
Su C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou
[2] State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou
来源
Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Vibration Engineering | 2020年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
Cloud method; Explicit time-domain dimension-reduced iteration; Long-span bridge; Nonlinear time-history analysis; Seismic fragility analysis;
D O I
10.16385/j.cnki.issn.1004-4523.2020.04.020
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Structural seismic fragility analysis is an effective means of assessing the seismic capacity of structures. The cloud method is one of the widely used seismic fragility analysis methods. This method requires tens to hundreds of nonlinear time-history analyses to build the relationship between statistical values of structural seismic demands and seismic intensity measures, which is time consuming for long-span bridge structures. To that end, the explicit time-domain dimension-reduced iteration method is incorporated with the cloud method. With the merit of dimension-reduced representation of time-domain explicit expressions for the structural dynamic responses, only those degrees of freedom associated with the nonlinear elements are involved in the iterative calculation, thus hundreds of nonlinear time history analyses can be conducted on large-scale structures with high efficiency. Then an efficient way to calculate the seismic vulnerability of long-span bridges is achieved. A long-span suspension bridge is taken as the engineering example, and the seismic fragility curves of the bridge corresponding to four damage states are obtained. The results show that the combination of the explicit time-domain dimension-reduced iteration method and the cloud method can effectively improve the efficiency of the structural seismic fragility analysis, especially for assessing the seismic vulnerability of large complex structures such as long-span bridges. © 2020, Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics an Astronautics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 823
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Wu Wenpeng, Li Lifeng, Hu Sicong, Et al., Research review and future prospect of the seismic fragility analysis for the highway bridges, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 37, 4, pp. 85-96, (2017)
[2]  
Huang H, Huang H, Liu Jingbo, Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges, China Civil Engineering Journal, 37, 6, pp. 47-51, (2004)
[3]  
Sudret B, Mai C V, Konakli K., Computing seismic fragility curves using non-parametric representations, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, (2014)
[4]  
Shinozuka M, Feng M, Lee J, Et al., Statistical analysis of fragility curves, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126, pp. 1224-1231, (2000)
[5]  
Mackie K, Stojadinovic B., Probabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridges, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 6, 6, pp. 468-481, (2001)
[6]  
Zhang J, Huo Y L., Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method, Engineering Structures, 31, pp. 1648-1660, (2009)
[7]  
Pang Y T, Wu X, Shen G Y, Et al., Seismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertainties, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19, 4, (2014)
[8]  
Wu W P, Li L F, Shao X D., Seismic assessment of medium-span concrete cable-stayed bridges using the component and system fragility functions, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21, 6, (2016)
[9]  
Zhong J, Jeon J S, Yuan W C, Et al., Impact of spatial variability parameters on seismic fragilities of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to differential support motions, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22, 6, (2017)
[10]  
Su Cheng, Li Baomu, Chen Taicong, Et al., Nonlinear random vibration analysis of energy-dissipation structures with viscous dampers by random simulation method based on explicit time-domain dimension-reduced iteration scheme, Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 33, 4, pp. 556-563, (2016)