Emergency evacuation risk assessment for toxic gas attacks in airport terminals: Model, algorithm, and application

被引:1
作者
Luan, Tianyi [1 ]
Gai, Wenmei [1 ]
Sun, Diange [2 ]
Dong, Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Ind Relat, Inst Safety Engn, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emergency management; Individual response; Airport terminal; Toxic gas attack; Risk assessment; Algorithm; DISPERSION; VENTILATION; HAZARDS; ALARP; MANAGEMENT; PRINCIPLE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2024.110576
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Transportation infrastructure has often been the target of terrorist attacks, and mitigation of the risk of toxic gas attacks is a challenging task in the design of indoor emergency evacuation systems. Considering multiple emergency response modes, we propose an agent-based risk assessment model and its algorithm to integrate gas diffusion and pedestrian movement data for emergency response, quickly assessing average individual exposure risk. We assessed the exposure status of individuals with respect to their emergency response actions following a toxic gas attack in an airport terminal. The results indicate that in the event of a general gas attack on an airport terminal, ventilation must be immediately ceased along with early evacuation. In areas with a shelter-in-place environment, the ventilation mode and shelter-in-place time should be determined based on the concentration of indoor and outdoor gases. In areas with nerve gas exposure and high population density, a new exit must be established at evacuation bottlenecks, and pedestrians must be guided to evacuate while promptly closing ventilation. These results offer suggestions and strategies for emergency response and decision-making in airport terminals during such incidents.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry [J].
Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim ;
Abrahamsen, Hakon Bjorheim ;
Milazzo, Maria Francesca ;
Selvik, Jon Tommeras .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 169 :160-165
[2]  
Action PP, 2001, Husky45SmuCa
[3]   Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations for Turbulence Modeling [J].
Alfonsi, Giancarlo .
APPLIED MECHANICS REVIEWS, 2009, 62 (04) :1-20
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Human Dimensions of Chinese Adults
[5]  
Assael MJ., 2010, Fires, explosions, and toxic gas dispersions: effects calculation and risk analysis, DOI [10.1201/9781439826768, DOI 10.1201/9781439826768]
[6]   Cellular automata: From a theoretical parallel computational model to its application to complex systems [J].
Bandini, S ;
Mauri, G ;
Serra, R .
PARALLEL COMPUTING, 2001, 27 (05) :539-553
[7]   Characteristics of emergency evacuations in airport terminal buildings: A new event database [J].
Bateman, Georgia ;
Majumdar, Arnab .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 130 (130)
[8]   Threshold quantity criteria for risk management programs: recommendations for toxic releases [J].
Batterman, S ;
Kovacs, E .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 105 (1-3) :39-60
[9]   A UQ based calibration for the CFD modeling of the gas dispersion from an LNG pool [J].
Bellegoni, Marco ;
Chicchiero, Claudio ;
Landucci, Gabriele ;
Galletti, Chiara ;
Salvetti, Maria Vittoria .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2022, 162 :1043-1056
[10]   GB toxicity reassessed using newer techniques for estimation of human toxicity from animal inhalation toxicity data: New method for estimating acute human toxicity (GB) [J].
Bide, RW ;
Armour, SJ ;
Yee, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 25 (05) :393-409