Sociality Probe: Game-Theoretic Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Modeling and Quantifying Social Patterns in Driving Interaction

被引:1
作者
Liu, Yiru [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xiaocong [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Jian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Traff Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
关键词
Driving behavior; autonomous driving; social interaction; game theory; inverse reinforcement learning; reward function; CAR-FOLLOWING MODEL; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2024.3461162
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Autonomous vehicles (AV) are consistently criticized for their inadequacies in harmoniously interacting with human-driven vehicles (HV), primarily attributed to the lack of sociality, a key human trait that balances individual and group rewards. Understanding sociality is essential for smooth AV navigation but remains challenging. To address this, we propose a Game-Theoretic Inverse Reinforcement Learning (GT-IRL) approach to quantify individualized sociality in driving interaction. Our approach identifies the sociality-preference parameters of a pre-designed reward function that integrates the ego agent's rewards and the group rewards shared by all the interacting agents. Instead of presuming an agent is propelled by the maximization of its own rewards, the game-theoretical mechanism is utilized within the IRL structure to capture the fact that human drivers take into account others' interests. We validated our method using human driving data from an unprotected left-turn scenario. The results demonstrate that the proposed GT-IRL outperforms state-of-the-art methods in better reproducing the evolution of the left-turn interaction at both semantic and trajectory levels. Additionally, cross-dataset analysis reveals variations in sociality due to geographical differences (China vs. the U.S.) and the nature of the interacting entities (AV vs. HV or HV vs. HV).
引用
收藏
页码:20841 / 20853
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Chai C, 2019, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P175, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917421
  • [12] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2022, Intersection Safety
  • [14] Guanming Liu, 2020, Proceedings of the 2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI), P747, DOI 10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338515
  • [15] An Integrated Framework of Decision Making and Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Social Behaviors
    Hang, Peng
    Lv, Chen
    Huang, Chao
    Cai, Jiacheng
    Hu, Zhongxu
    Xing, Yang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (12) : 14458 - 14469
  • [16] Hubmann C, 2017, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P1671, DOI 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995949
  • [17] Inga J, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1911.07503
  • [18] The Trajectron: Probabilistic Multi-Agent Trajectory Modeling With Dynamic Spatiotemporal Graphs
    Ivanovic, Boris
    Pavone, Marco
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV 2019), 2019, : 2375 - 2384
  • [19] General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models
    Kesting, Arne
    Treiber, Martin
    Helbing, Dirk
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, (1999) : 86 - 94
  • [20] Kometani E., 1958, J OPERATIONS RES JAP, V2, P11