MPS.BR: A successful program for software process improvement in Brazil

被引:27
作者
COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68511, ZIP 21945-970, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
[1] COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, ZIP 21945-970, Rio de Janeiro, RJ
[2] SOFTEX, Association for Promoting the Brazilian Software Excellence, ZIP 13081-970, Campinas, SP
来源
Softw. Process Improv. Pract. | 2009年 / 5卷 / 289-300期
关键词
CMMI; ISO/IEC; 15504; Software process assessment model; Software process reference model;
D O I
10.1002/spip.428
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Software process improvement implementation based on software process reference models and standards is a complex and long-term endeavor that requires investment of large sums of money. These obstacles usually hinder organizations from implementing software process improvement successfully, especially for small and medium-size enterprises that operate under strict financial resources. This paper describes the MPS.BR, a nationwide program for software process improvement in Brazilian organizations. The main goal of this initiative is to develop and disseminate a Brazilian software process model (named MPS Model) aiming to establish a feasible pathway for organizations to achieve benefits from implementing software process improvement at reasonable costs, especially small and medium-size enterprises. This paper presents themain components of the MPSModel and discusses the strategy executed to establish and maintain a community of MPS Model practitioners. The results of MPS Model adoption and dissemination in Brazilian software industry are also presented in this paper. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 300
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [11] Systems and Software Engineering-Software Life Cycle Processes, (2008)
  • [12] (2009)
  • [13] Meek B., Too soon, too late, too narrow, too wide, too shallow, too deep, Standard View, 4, 2, pp. 114-118, (1996)
  • [14] Richardson I., Wangenheim C.G., Guest Editors' introduction: Why are small software organizations different?, IEEE Software, 24, 1, pp. 18-22, (2007)
  • [15] Rout T.P., El Emam K., Fusani M., Goldenson D., Jung H.W., SPICE in retrospect: Developing a standard for process assessment, Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 9, pp. 1483-1493, (2007)
  • [16] Staples M., Niazi M., Jeffery R., Abrahams A., Byatt P., Murphy R., An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI, Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 6, pp. 883-895, (2007)
  • [17] Veloso F., Botelho A.J.J., Tschang T., Amsden A., Slicing the Knowledge-based Economy in Brazil, China and India: A Tale of 3 Software Industries, (2003)
  • [18] Wangenheim C.G., Varkoi T., Salviano C.F., Standard based software process assessments in small companies, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 11, 3, pp. 329-335, (2006)