Model updating hybrid simulation test method based on uniform design

被引:0
|
作者
Chen Z. [1 ]
Zhong W. [1 ]
Li Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai), Weihai
来源
关键词
Hybrid simulation test; Model updating; OpenSees; Substructure; Uniform design;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.21.002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With increase in DOFs, substructure number and updating parameters in hybrid simulation tests, sample points and computational amount needed to search more optimal parameters for model updating hybrid simulation tests can obviously increase. Here, from the perspective of testing design, a model updating hybrid simulation test method based on uniform design was proposed. Based on tested substructures, the uniform design was used to construct a sample space of checking substructures. Taking restoring force as an objective, the most suitable numerical model of checking substructures for tested substructures was found as the source of updating constitutive parameters of the studied numerical structure to effectively improve the identification efficiency. Considering different constitutive models of steel products and bending moment processing situations at boundaries of tested substructures, a single-span two-story steel frame structure was taken as an example to do 4 types of numerical simulations. The model updating hybrid simulation tests adopted Matlab-OpenSees mixed programming, and the software data interaction adopted socket interface. The efficiency was improved effectively compared with the traditional text read-write interaction. Results showed that the proposed method is suitable for different boundary processing situations; the model updating calculation time is reduced greatly, and the accuracy of the proposed hybrid simulation tests is improved effectively. © 2020, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] HAKUNO M, SHIDAWARA M, HARA T., Dynamic destructive test of a cantilevers beam, controlled by an analogcomputer, Transaction of the Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 171, pp. 1-9, (1969)
  • [2] KWON O S, ELNASHAI A S, SPENCER B F., A framework for distributed analytical and hybrid simulations, Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 30, 3, pp. 331-350, (2008)
  • [3] NAKASHIMA M., Hybrid simulation: an early history, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49, 10, pp. 949-962, (2020)
  • [4] SHING P B, NAKASHIMA M, BURSI O S., Application of pseudodynamic test method to structural research, Earthquake Spectra, 12, 1, pp. 29-56, (1996)
  • [5] SHAO X, GRIFFITH C., An overview of hybrid simulation implementations in NEES projects, Engineering Structures, 56, pp. 1439-1451, (2013)
  • [6] WANG Tao, PAN Peng, Study and application of substructure online hybrid test method, Engineering Mechanics, 35, 2, pp. 1-12, (2018)
  • [7] CHEN Zaixian, HAN Guang, WANG Huanding, Et al., Error study on conventional interface scheme of substructure pseudo-dynamic testing method, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, pp. 657-662, (2014)
  • [8] CHEN Zaixian, KONG Wenjiang, WANG Huanding, Substructure hybrid simulation testing method considering overturning moment, Journal of Building Structures, 37, 9, pp. 99-107, (2016)
  • [9] ELANWAR H H, ELNASHAI A S., Application of in-test model updating to earthquake structural assessment, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 20, 1, pp. 1-18, (2015)
  • [10] KWON O S, KAMMULA V., Model updating method for substructure pseudo-dynamic hybrid simulation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42, 13, pp. 1971-1984, (2013)