Experiment of fast cook-off safety characteristic for penetrator

被引：0

作者：

Dai X. ^{[1
]}

Wang K. ^{[1
]}

Shen Z. ^{[1
]}

Duan J. ^{[1
]}

Li M. ^{[1
]}

Gu R. ^{[1
]}

Li P. ^{[1
]}

Yang H. ^{[1
]}

Ke M. ^{[1
]}

Zhou G. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an

来源：

Baozha Yu Chongji/Explosion and Shock Waves | 2020年 / 40卷 / 09期

关键词：

Fast cook-off; Penetrator; Safety characteristic; Shock wave overpressure;

D O I：

10.11883/bzycj/2020-0016

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

To evaluate the fast cook-off safety characteristic of the big-size penetrator, an experimental device was designed. The penetrator with a mass of 290 kg was hoisted at a height of 0.4 m from the aviation fuel level for rapid heating. The surface temperature of the penetrator was collected in real time and the whole experimental process was recorded. The reflected shock wave overpressure at a distance of 7 m from the penetrator centroid was measured. The safety characteristic of the big-size penetrator was analyzed in detail in terms of the heating time, the surface temperature of the penetrator, the damage on experimental site, the peak value of the reflected shock wave overpressure, the reaction mechanism and the response type. The results show that the big-size penetrator starts to react violently at a temperature of 537 ℃ for 16 min and 4 s. The bottom explosive of the penetrator first responds to hot spots under continuous high temperature heating, gradually accumulating high-temperature and high-pressure gas in the shell and tearing the shell to quickly release high-pressure. The peak value of the reflected shock wave overpressure at 7 m is 33.622 kPa, which is much smaller than that caused by the penetrator totally detonated in the air. The reaction characteristic of the penetrator is deflagration, and its fast cook-off safety characteristic meets the standard requirement. Explosion and Shock Waves

引用

共 20 条

[1] pp. 45-118, (2015)
[2] WITHERELL M, PFLEGL G., Prediction of propellant and explosive cook-off for the 30-mm HEI-T and raufoss MPLD-T rounds chambered in a hot MK44 Barrel (advanced amphibious assault vehicle-AAAV): ADA-388280, (2001)
[3] TRINGE J W, GLASCOE E A, MCCLELLAND M A, Et al., Pre-ignition confinement and deflagration violence in LX-10 and PBX 9501, Journal of Applied Physics, 116, 5, (2014)
[4] GROSS M L, MEREDITH K V, BECKSTEAD M W., Fast cook-off modeling of HMX, Combustion and Flame, 162, 9, pp. 3307-3315, (2015)
[5] ZHANG X, GU Y, ZHANG Y P, Et al., Numerical simulation and experimental study of fast cook-off of TATB-based PBX explosive, Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 18, 5, pp. 551-557, (2010)
[6] CHENG B, LI W B, ZHENG Y, Et al., Study on ANPyO explosive in fast cook-off test under different constraint conditions, Explosive Materials, 42, 5, pp. 53-56, (2013)
[7] CHEN K Q, HUANG H J, LU Z H, Et al., Experimental study on cook-off test for melt-cast and cast-cured explosive at strong constraint, Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 36, 1, pp. 133-136, (2015)
[8] LI L L, SHEN F, WANG S Q, Et al., Effect of external shell coating and coating layer on fast cook-off test of HAE charge, Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 42, 2, pp. 202-206, (2019)
[9] LI L L, SHEN F, QU K P, Et al., Response characteristics of HAE charge with different sealing condition and coating layer in fast cook-off, Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 26, 8, pp. 696-700, (2018)
[10] SUN P P, NAN H., The influence of shell parameters on fast cook-off reaction of explosives, Initiators & Pyrotechnics, 4, pp. 29-31, (2016)

← 1 2 →