Accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests via infrared spectroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Cobre, Alexandre de Fatima [1 ,2 ]
Fachi, Mariana Millan [1 ]
Domingues, Karime Zeraik Abdalla [1 ]
Lazo, Raul Edison Luna [1 ]
Ferreira, Luana Mota [4 ]
Tonin, Fernanda Stumpf [3 ]
Pontarolo, Roberto [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Pharmaceut Sci Postgrad Program, Curitiba, Brazil
[2] Univ Surrey, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Sch Biosci & Med, Guildford, England
[3] Inst Politecn Lisboa, H &TRC Hlth & Technol Res Ctr, ESTeSL, Escola Super Tecnol Saude, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Pharm, Pharmaceut Sci Postgrad Program, Curitiba, Brazil
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; FTIR; Evidence; Sensitivity; Specificity; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.saa.2024.125337
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
This study aims to synthesize the evidence on the accuracy parameters of COVID-19 diagnosis methods using infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). A systematic review with searches in PubMed and Embase was performed (September 2023). Studies reporting data on test specificity, sensitivity, true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative using different human samples were included. Meta-analysis of accuracy estimates with 95 % confidence intervals and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were conducted (Meta-Disc 1.4.7). Seventeen studies were included - all of them highlighted regions 650-1800 cm-1 and 2300-3900 cm-1 as most important for diagnosing COVID-19. The FTIR technique presented high sensitivity [0.912 (95 %CI, 0.878-0.939), especially in vaccinated [0.959 (CI95 %, 0.908-0.987)] compared to unvaccinated [0.625 (CI95 %, 0.584-0.664)] individuals for COVID-19. Overall specificity was also high [0.886 (95 %CI, 0.855-0.912), with increased rates in vaccinated [0.884 (CI95 %, 0.819-0.932)] than in unvaccinated [0.667 (CI95 %, 0.629-0.704)] patients. These findings reveal that FTIR is an accurate technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in different biological matrices with advantages including low cost, rapid and environmentally friendly with minimal preparation analyses. This could lead to an easy implementation of this technique in practice as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19, especially in low-income countries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19
    Boger, Beatriz
    Fachi, Mariana M.
    Vilhena, Raquel O.
    Cobre, Alexandre F.
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2021, 49 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [2] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy Tests of COVID-19
    Vilca-Alosilla, Juan Jeferson
    Candia-Puma, Mayron Antonio
    Coronel-Monje, Katiusca
    Goyzueta-Mamani, Luis Daniel
    Galdino, Alexsandro Sobreira
    Machado-de-Avila, Ricardo Andrez
    Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
    Coelho, Eduardo Antonio Ferraz
    Chavez-Fumagalli, Miguel Angel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (09)
  • [3] Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 antigen tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yuan-Hung
    Wu, Chia-Chang
    Bai, Chyi-Huey
    Lu, Shou-Cheng
    Yang, Yi-Ping
    Lin, Yi-Ying
    Lai, Wei-Yi
    Lin, Tzu-Wei
    Jheng, Ying-Chun
    Lee, Ming-Cheng
    Chen, Cheng-Chieh
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 84 (11) : 1028 - 1037
  • [4] Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Detection: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
    Arshadi, Maniya
    Fardsanei, Fatemeh
    Deihim, Behnaz
    Farshadzadeh, Zahra
    Nikkhahi, Farhad
    Khalili, Farima
    Sotgiu, Giovanni
    Bonjar, Amir Hashem Shahidi
    Centis, Rosella
    Migliori, Giovanni Battista
    Nasiri, Mohammad Javad
    Mirsaeidi, Mehdi
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [5] A systematic and meta-analysis review on the diagnostic accuracy of antibodies in the serological diagnosis of COVID-19
    Arthur Vengesai
    Herald Midzi
    Maritha Kasambala
    Hamlet Mutandadzi
    Tariro L. Mduluza-Jokonya
    Simbarashe Rusakaniko
    Francisca Mutapi
    Thajasvarie Naicker
    Takafira Mduluza
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [6] A systematic and meta-analysis review on the diagnostic accuracy of antibodies in the updates serological diagnosis of COVID-19
    Vengesai, Arthur
    Midzi, Herald
    Kasambala, Maritha
    Mutandadzi, Hamlet
    Mduluza-Jokonya, Tariro L.
    Rusakaniko, Simbarashe
    Mutapi, Francisca
    Naicker, Thajasvarie
    Mduluza, Takafira
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of tests for leprosy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gurung, P.
    Gomes, C. M.
    Vernal, S.
    Leeflang, M. M. G.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (11) : 1315 - 1327
  • [8] Accuracy of cholera rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muzembo, Basilua Andre
    Kitahara, Kei
    Debnath, Anusuya
    Okamoto, Keinosuke
    Miyoshi, Shin-Ichi
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [9] Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khalid, Muhammad Fazli
    Selvam, Kasturi
    Jeffry, Alfeq Jazree Nashru
    Salmi, Mohamad Fazrul
    Najib, Mohamad Ahmad
    Norhayati, Mohd Noor
    Aziah, Ismail
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [10] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of SARS-COV-2 IGM and IGG tests in individuals with COVID-19
    Macedo, Ana Cristina Lacerda
    Prestes, Gabriele da Silveira
    Colonetti, Tamy
    Candido, Ana Claudia Rodrigues
    Uggioni, Maria Laura Rodrigues
    Gomes, Ariane Cruz
    Silva, Fabio Rosa
    Ceratta, Luciane Bisognin
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 148