Purification of CH4 from CH4/CO2 mixture by pressure swing adsorption

被引：0

作者：

Yang, Haiyan ^{[1
,2
]}

Li, Wenzhe ^{[2
]}

Zhang, Hongqiong ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] College of Science, Northeast Agricultural University

[2] College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University

来源：

Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery | 2013年 / 44卷 / 03期

关键词：

Biogas; Molecular sieve; Pressure swing adsorption; Regeneration;

D O I：

10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.03.022

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Selective adsorption of CO2 from its mixture with CH4 on several commercial molecular sieves was studied at ambient temperature (25°C) and low pressure (0.2 MPa). The behaviours of the molecular sieves were compared by using three basic parameters: selectivity, adsorption capacity and regenerability. The results indicate 3A and 4A molecular sieves have low CO2 adsorption capacity. However 5A and 13X molecular sieves show high efficiency in dynamic separation of CH4 and CO2 when the adsorbents are used for the first time. The separation coefficient between CH4 and CO2 on 13X molecular sieve is higher than 5A, which proves 13X molecular sieve show better performance in separating CO2 from its mixture with CH4. But 5A and 13X molecular sieve could not be regenerated completely by vacuuming and the adsorption/regeneration performance became stable from their second use. The reason why separation performance of 5A and 13X molecular sieves decrease is explained by FTIR spectroscopy that the partial poisoning of the molecular sieves happened. That is to say the regenerability of the two molecular sieves need improve.

引用

页码：119 / 123

页数：4

共 16 条

[1]

Berglund M., Borjesson P., Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production, Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 3, pp. 254-266, (2006)

[2]

Yiridoe E.K., Gordon R., Brown B.B., Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production, Energy Policy, 37, 3, pp. 1170-1179, (2009)

[3]

Poschl M., Ward S., Owende P., Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways, Applied Energy, 87, 11, pp. 3305-3321, (2010)

[4]

Patterson T., Esteves S., Dinsdale R., Et al., Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale, Bioresource Technology, 102, 15, pp. 7313-7323, (2011)

[5]

Jiang X., Sommer S.G., Christensen K.V., A review of the biogas industry in China, Energy Policy, 39, 10, pp. 6073-6081, (2011)

[6]

Ghoufi A., Gaberova L., Rouquerol J., Et al., Adsorption of CO2, CH4 and their binary mixture in Faujasite NaY: A combination of molecular simulations with gravimetry-manometry and microcalorimetry measurements, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 119, 1-3, pp. 117-128, (2009)

[7]

Zhou S., Dong Y., Zhang Y., Et al., Low temperature liquid separation technology of CO2 from biogas based on Aspen HYSYS, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 42, 8, pp. 111-116, (2011)

[8]

Alonso-Vicario A., Ochoa-Gomez J.R., Gil-Rio S., Et al., Purification and upgrading of biogas by pressure swing adsorption on synthetic and natural zeolites, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 134, 1-3, pp. 100-107, (2010)

[9]

Cavenati S., Grande C.A., Rodrigues A.E., Separation of CH4/CO2/N2 mixtures by layered pressure swing adsorption for upgrade of natural gas, Chemical Engineering Science, 61, 12, pp. 3893-3906, (2006)

[10]

Tagliabue M., Farrusseng D., Valencia S., Et al., Natural gas treating by selective adsorption: material science and chemical engineering interplay, Chemical Engineering Journal, 155, 3, pp. 553-566, (2009)

← 1 2 →