Effects of Endwall Unsteady Pulsed Suction on a Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade under Different Incidence Angles

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang H.-X. [1 ]
Chen S.-W. [1 ]
Li W.-H. [1 ]
Wang S.-T. [1 ]
Wang Z.-Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Engine Aerodynamics Research Centre, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
来源
关键词
Flow separation; Highly loaded compressor; Incidence angle; Time-averaged suction flow rate; Unsteady pulsed suction;
D O I
10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.180449
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to further explore the mechanism of unsteady pulsed suction (UPS) to control flow separations in a highly loaded compressor cascade and investigate the adaptability and flexibility of UPS under different incidence angles, the effects of UPS on flow field performances under different incidence angles are studied systemically by numerical simulation, and the comparative analysis between UPS and conventional steady contant suction (SCS) is carried out. The results show that the control effect of flow separations for UPS under the designed incidence angle is obviously better than that for SCS with the same time-averaged suction flow rate. UPS shows better performances in a given range of excitation frequency with the time-averaged suction flow rate ms=0.4%, based on the optimum excitation frequency for UPS, the loss is reduced by 9.4% and the static pressure rise coefficient increased by 12.9%, and compared to SCS, the loss is reduced by 4.2% and the static pressure rise coefficient increased by 4.7%. UPS has still a greater advantage compared to SCS in a given range of excitation frequency under different incidence angles, however, the control effects of UPS and SCS are decreased under a large incidence angle. © 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of Propulsion Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2206 / 2215
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Schatz M., Thiele F., Numerical Study of High-Lift Flow with Separation Control by Periodic Excitation
  • [2] Seifert A., Bachar T., Koss D., Et al., Oscillatory Blowing: a Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation, AIAA Journal, 31, 11, pp. 2052-2060, (1993)
  • [3] Evans S., Hodson H., Hynes T., Et al., Controlling Separation on a Simulated Compressor Blade Using Vortex-Generator Jets, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 26, 4, pp. 819-827, (2010)
  • [4] Hecklau M., Zander V., Peltzer I., Et al., Experimental AFC Approaches on a Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade, pp. 171-186, (2010)
  • [5] Hecklau M., Wiederhold O., Zander V., Active Separation Control with Pulsed Jets in a Critically Loaded Compressor Cascade, AIAA Journal, 49, 8, pp. 1729-1739, (2011)
  • [6] De Giorgi M.G., De Luca C.G., Ficarella A., Et al., Comparison Between Synthetic Jets and Continuous Jets for Active Flow Control: Application on a NACA 0015 and a Compressor Stator Cascade, Aerospace Science and Technology, 43, pp. 256-280, (2015)
  • [7] Gmelin C., Zander V., Hecklau M., Et al., Active Flow Control Concepts on a Highly Loaded Subsonic Compressor Cascade: Résumé of Experimental and Numerical Results, Journal of Turbomachinery, 134, 6, (2012)
  • [8] Qin Y., Wang R.-Y., Song Y.-P., Et al., Effects of Endwall Synthetic Jet on Loss Characteristics of a Highly Loaded Compressor Cascade, Journal of Propulsion Technology, 38, 9, pp. 1975-1986, (2017)
  • [9] Qin Y., Liu H.-P., Wang R.-Y., Et al., Effects of Actuation Parameters on Flow Separation Control in Compressor with Synthetic Jets, Journal of Propulsion Technology, 38, 5, pp. 1030-1037, (2017)
  • [10] Zong H.H., Kotsonis M., Experimental Investigation on Fequency Characteristics of Plasma Synthetic Jets, Physics of Fluids, 29, 11, (2017)