Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in artificial, contaminated soil using ferrous sulfate heptahydrate and sodium thiosulfate

被引:20
作者
Kostarelos, Konstantinos [1 ]
Rao, Ennio [2 ]
Reale, Daniela [2 ]
Moon, Deok Hyun [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus
[2] URS Italia SpA, 20143 Milano
[3] Center for Environmental Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken
关键词
Chromium; Heavy metals; Soil pollution;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2009)13:2(135)
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to widespread use in industrial applications, chromium compounds are often considered one of the most serious heavy metal pollutants found at environmental sites. Stabilization/solidification has been studied as a means of immobilizing chromium within a solid matrix. Reduction to a lower valence state is an effective treatment option when coupled with a stabilization/solidification treatment, so that any chromium subsequently leached from the treated soil into groundwater is the less toxic and less mobile trivalent form of chromium. Some studies also indicate that reduction from Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is a necessary preliminary step to effective immobilization. Recent studies have reported the use of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate as an effective reducing agent. However, the possibility of chromium release after such treatment has also been called into question. This technical note presents an alternative to ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, the less-expensive sodium thiosulfate, to reduce hexavalent-chromium contaminated soil and compares the results with the use of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate. The most effective ratio of chemical reagent to hexavalent chromium is reported for the purpose of reducing the chromium to the trivalent form in an artificial, contaminated soil for both reductants. The effectiveness of reduction to trivalent chromium was measured using a modified TCLP test. Based on the results reported in this technical note and possible cost savings over the use of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, further study in the use of sodium thiosulfate for treatment of Cr(VI) contaminated soil is suggested. © 2009 ASCE.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 139
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Amacher M.L., Baker D.E., Amacher M.L., Baker D.E., Redox reactions involving chromium, plutonium, and manganese in soils, DOE/DP/04515-1, (1982)
[2]  
Toxicological Profile for Chromium, (2000)
[3]  
Dermatas D., Chrysochoou M., Moon D.H., Grubb D.G., Wazne M., Christodoulatos C., Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 18, pp. 5786-5792, (2006)
[4]  
Dermatas D., Meng X., Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/solidification (S/S) of heavy metal contaminated soils, Eng. Geol. (Amsterdam), 70, 3-4, pp. 377-394, (2003)
[5]  
Evanko C.R., Dzombak D.A., Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and groundwater, Technology Evaluation Rep. No. TE-97-01, (1997)
[6]  
Geelhoed J.S., Meeussen J.C.L., Roe M.J., Chromium remediation or release? Effect of iron (II) sulfate addition on chromium (VI) leaching from columns of chromite ore processing residual, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 14, pp. 3206-3213, (2003)
[7]  
Hillier S., Roe M.J., Geelhoed J.S., Fraser A.R., Farmer J.G., Paterson E., Role of quantitative mineralogical analysis in the investigation of sites contaminated by chromite ore processing residue, Sci. Total Environ., 308, 1-3, pp. 195-210, (2003)
[8]  
Kostarelos K., Reale D., Dermatas D., Rao E., Moon D.H., Optimum dose of lime and fly ash for treatment of hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 6, 1, pp. 171-189, (2006)
[9]  
Kozuh N., Stupar J., Gorenc B., Reduction and oxidation processes of chromium in soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 1, pp. 112-119, (2000)
[10]  
Mertz W., Chromium as a dietary essential for man, Trace Elements Metabolism, pp. 185-198, (1974)