Spatial-temporal multi-graph convolution for traffic flow prediction by integrating knowledge graphs

被引:0
作者
Li J. [1 ]
Li Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou
来源
Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) | 2024年 / 58卷 / 07期
关键词
intelligent transportation; knowledge fusion module; multi-graph convolutional neural network; road network topological graph; traffic flow prediction; urban traffic knowledge graph;
D O I
10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2024.07.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A spatial-temporal multi-graph convolution traffic flow prediction model by integrating static and dynamic knowledge graphs was proposed, as current traffic flow prediction methods focus on the spatial-temporal correlation of traffic information and fail to fully take into account the influence of external factors on traffic. An urban traffic knowledge graph and four road network topological graphs with distinct semantics were systematically constructed, drawing upon the road traffic information and the external factors. The urban traffic knowledge graph was inputted into the relational evolution graph convolutional neural network to realize the knowledge embedding. The traffic flow matrix and the knowledge embedding were integrated using the knowledge fusion module. The four road network topology graphs and the traffic flow matrix with fused knowledge were fed into the spatial-temporal multi-graph convolution module to extract spatiotemporal features, and the traffic flow prediction value was outputted through the fully connected layer. The model performance was evaluated on a Hangzhou traffic data set. Compared with the advanced baseline, the performance of the proposed model improved by 5.76%-10.71%. Robustness experiment results show that the proposed model has a strong ability to resist interference. © 2024 Zhejiang University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1366 / 1376
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
LU Huapu, LI Ruimin, Developing trend of ITS and strategy suggestions [J], Journal of Engineering Studies, 6, 1, pp. 6-19, (2014)
[2]  
NAGY A M, SIMON V., Survey on traffic prediction in smart cities [J], Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 50, pp. 148-163, (2018)
[3]  
ZHOU Yi, HU Shuting, LI Wei, Et al., Graph neural network driven traffic prediction technology: review and challenge [J], Chinese Journal on Internet of Things, 5, 4, pp. 1-16, (2021)
[4]  
LANA I, DEL SER J, VELEZ M, Et al., Road traffic forecasting: recent advances and new challenges [J], IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 10, 2, pp. 93-109, (2018)
[5]  
WANG J, ZHU W, SUN Y, Et al., An effective dynamic spatiotemporal framework with external features information for traffic prediction [J], Applied Intelligence, 51, pp. 3159-3173, (2021)
[6]  
ZHANG D, KABUKA M R., Combining weather condition data to predict traffic flow: a GRU‐based deep learning approach [J], IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 12, 7, pp. 578-585, (2018)
[7]  
LI Z, JIN X, LI W, Et al., Temporal knowledge graph reasoning based on evolutional representation learning [C], Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 408-417, (2021)
[8]  
SUN Yun, LI Mingtao, YAO Xiaohui, Implementation of crowd flow prediction based on BP neural network [J], Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 6, 2, pp. 61-65, (2010)
[9]  
AHN J, KO E, KIM E Y., Highway traffic flow prediction using support vector regression and Bayesian classifier [C], 2016 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing, pp. 239-244, (2016)
[10]  
DAI G, MA C, XU X., Short-term traffic flow prediction method for urban road sections based on space–time analysis and GRU [J], IEEE Access, 7, pp. 143025-143035, (2019)