Dutch standard for condition assessment of buildings

被引:51
作者
Straub, Ad [1 ]
机构
[1] OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, Delft University of Technology
关键词
Buildings; Condition monitoring; Maintenance; Standardization; Surface defects; The Netherlands;
D O I
10.1108/02630800910941665
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This paper aims to provide insight into the use of a standard for condition assessment. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on a literature review, an analysis of the development, content and practical use of the Dutch Standard for Condition Assessment of Buildings, and the findings of several research projects about condition assessment and maintenance planning by Dutch housing associations. Findings: By using the standard for condition assessment, building inspectors can provide property managers with objective data about the condition status of building components. Aggregated condition data could be used for setting condition targets for built assets and for benchmarking. It is anticipated that as a result of the standardisation, condition surveys will become more reliable and as a consequence more popular among large-scale property owners. Research limitations/implications: The standard has been introduced recently. At present there is little experience of the use of (aggregated) condition data for maintenance planning and benchmarking built assets. Practical implications: The standard is a tool to assess the technical status of the properties to underpin the long-term maintenance expectations. Condition assessment is not meant for preparing the annual maintenance budget and planning of the work. Supplementary information is needed in the phase of preparing for the execution of remedial work. Originality/value: This paper provides practical tools for condition assessment and maintenance planning. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 35
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abbott G.R., McDuling J.J., Parsons S., Schoeman J.C., Building condition assessment: A performance evaluation tool towards sustainable asset management, Proceedings of the CIB World Building Congress 2007, pp. 649-62, (2007)
[2]  
Caccavelli D., Genre J.L., Diagnosis of the degradation state of building and cost evaluation of induced refurbishment works, Energy and Buildings, 31, 2, pp. 159-65, (2000)
[3]  
EN 13306 Maintenance Terminology, (2001)
[4]  
Chapman K.P., Dissatisfaction with stock condition surveys in social housing, Structural Survey, 17, 4, pp. 211-5, (1999)
[5]  
Brite Euram Project 4213 Condition Assessment and Maintenance Strategies for Building and Building Components, (1996)
[6]  
Damen T., Quah L.K., van Egmond H.C.M., Improving the art and science of condition-based maintenance systems, Proceedings of the CIB W070 Symposium, The Way Ahead into the Millennium, pp. 141-8, (1998)
[7]  
English House Condition Survey, (1991)
[8]  
Hermans M.H., Deterioration Characteristics of Building Components: A Data Collection Model to Support Performance Management, (1995)
[9]  
Hollis M., Bright K., Surveying the surveyors, Structural Survey, 17, 2, pp. 65-73, (1999)
[10]  
Horner R.M.W., El-Haram M.A., Munns A.K., Building maintenance strategy: A new management approach, Journal of Quality in Maintenance, 3, 4, pp. 273-80, (1997)