Dynamic human error risk assessment of group decision-making in extreme cooperative scenario

被引:5
作者
Qiao, Yidan [1 ]
Gao, Xinwei [2 ]
Ma, Lin [3 ]
Chen, Dengkai [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Group decision-making; Human error; Cooperative scenario; Cognitive behavior modeling; Risk assessment; HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; TEAM PERFORMANCE; RESILIENCE; ACCIDENTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2024.110194
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
For groups in extreme environments, their reliability requirements in complex operational systems are high due to isolation from society, physical constraints for extended periods of time, and exposure to significant hazards. This study attempts to solve the problem of dynamic quantitative risk analysis of decision-making process for extreme group during complex cooperative scenarios. Based on an extended IDA team cognitive model, typical failure modes and performance quantification mechanisms of team communication were analyzed. The performance curve was utilized to distinctively model the cognitive behaviors of operators within the team, driving the cognitive transmission paths of group decision-making in a hybrid event tree. Error calibration of human error due to time uncertainty was conducted. The steps and techniques for dynamic risk analysis of decision-making of extreme groups under complex, dynamic, and ambiguous scenarios were summarized. The proposed method was validated through simulation in a typical powered diving task of manned submarine.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] A human reliability analysis methodology for oil refineries and petrochemical plants operation: Phoenix-PRO qualitative framework
    Abilio Ramos, M.
    Lopez Droguett, E.
    Mosleh, A.
    Das Chagas Moura, M.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 193
  • [2] Human reliability analysis of conventional maritime pilotage operations supported by a prospective model
    Abreu, Danilo T. M. P.
    Maturana, Marcos C.
    Droguett, Enrique Lopez
    Martins, Marcelo R.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 228
  • [3] Identifying human failure events (HFEs) for external hazard probabilistic risk assessment
    Al-Douri, Ahmad
    Levine, Camille S.
    Groth, Katrina M.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 235
  • [4] Team resilience: How teams flourish under pressure
    Alliger, George M.
    Cerasoli, Christopher P.
    Tannenbaum, Scott I.
    Vessey, William B.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (03) : 176 - 184
  • [5] Modeling and assessment of human and organization factors of nuclear safety culture in Saudi Arabia
    Alshehri, Salman M.
    Alzahrani, Salman M.
    Alwafi, Anas M.
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2023, 404
  • [6] AK-SESC: a novel reliability procedure based on the integration of active learning kriging and sequential space conversion method
    Ameryan, Ala
    Ghalehnovi, Mansour
    Rashki, Mohsen
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 217
  • [7] Predicting human reliability based on probabilistic mission completion time using Bayesian Network
    Asadayoobi, N.
    Taghipour, S.
    Jaber, M. Y.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 221
  • [8] Development of dynamic integrated consequence evaluation (DICE) for dynamic event tree approaches: Numerical validation for a loss of coolant accident
    Baek, Sejin
    Heo, Gyunyoung
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 238
  • [9] Barriere MT, 1999, NUREG-1624
  • [10] Bayesian post-processing of Monte Carlo simulation in reliability analysis
    Betz, Wolfgang
    Papaioannou, Iason
    Straub, Daniel
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 227