Effect of base isolation systems on increasing the resistance of structures subjected to progressive collapse

被引：0

作者：

Tavakoli, Hamid R. ^{[1
]}

Naghavia, Fahime ^{[1
]}

Goltabarb, Ali R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Earthquake Engineering, Babol University and Technology, Babol

来源：

Earthquake and Structures | 2015年 / 9卷 / 03期

关键词：

Base isolation; Column removal; Nonlinear time history analysis; Progressive collapse; Push down analysis; Seismic loads;

D O I：

10.12989/eas.2015.9.3.639

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Seismic isolation devices are commonly used to mitigate damages caused by seismic responses of structures. More damages are created due to progressive collapse in structures. Therefore, evaluating the impact of the isolation systems to enhance progressive collapse-resisting capacity is very important. In this study, the effect of lead rubber bearing isolation system to increase the resistance of structures against progressive collapse was evaluated. Concrete moment resisting frames were used in both the fixed and base-isolated model structures. Then, progressive collapse-resisting capacity of frames was investigated using the push down nonlinear static analysis under gravity loads that specified in GSA guideline. Nonlinear dynamic analysis was performed to consider dynamic effects column removal under earthquake. The results of the push down analysis are highly dependent on location of removal column and floor number of buildings. Also, seismic isolation system does not play an effective role in increasing the progressive collapse-resisting capacities of structures under gravity loads. Base isolation helps to localize failures and prevented from spreading it to intact span under seismic loads. © 2015 Techno-Press, Ltd.

引用

页码：639 / 656

页数：17

共 31 条

[1]

Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, (2008)

[2]

Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, (1996)

[3]

Corley W.G., Sr P.F.M., Sozen M.A., Thornton C.H., The Oklahoma City bombing: Summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation, J. Perform. Constr. Facil, 12, 3, pp. 100-112, (1998)

[4]

Corley W.G., Applicability of seismic design in mitigating progressive collapse, Proceedings of National Workshop on Prevention of Progressive Collapse, (2002)

[5]

Crawford J.E., Retrofit methods to mitigate progressive collapse, Multihazard Mitigation Council National Workshop on Prevention on Progressive Collapse, (2002)

[6]

Ellingwood B.R., Smilowitz R., Dusenberry D.O., Duthinh D., Lew H., Carino N., Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings, (2007)

[7]

NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, (1997)

[8]

Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects, (2003)

[9]

Hayes J.R., Woodson S.C., Pekelnicky R.G., Poland C.D., Corley W.G., Sozen M., Can strengthening for earthquake improve blast and progressive collapse resistance?, J. Struct. Eng., 131, 8, pp. 1157-1177, (2005)

[10]

Jangid R., Optimum lead-rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions, Eng. Struct., 29, 10, pp. 2503-2513, (2007)

← 1 2 3 4 →