Dynamics of software systems projects during the requirements process improvement

被引:0
作者
Zawedde, Aminah [1 ]
Williams, Ddembe [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Computing and Informatics Technology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala
[2] Faculty of Computing and Information Management, KCA University, P.O. Box 56808 00200, Nairobi
关键词
Cost; Quality; Requirements process improvement; RPI; Schedule; Software systems; System dynamics modelling;
D O I
10.1504/IJSPM.2014.066340
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Requirements process improvement (RPI) in software systems is aimed at systematically controlling changes of the requirements specification and making improvements that result in high quality specifications at reduced costs and delivered within the specified schedule. RPI activities are dynamic and complex processes managing all changes to the requirements process. Therefore, in order to meet customer and business needs, organisations need to have an effective RPI that will result into quality specifications, within a stipulated budget. This paper explores the dynamics that exists among the factors that influence a successful RPI in order to provide the understanding required to explain how the underpinning process attributes affect the quality and associated costs of the RE specification delivered to the customer. The authors contend that the developed system dynamics based RPI model is a generic decision making framework for an effective approach to RPI. Copyright © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 221
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Exploring the relationship between organizational culture and software process improvement deployment [J].
Shih, Chiao-Ching ;
Huang, Sun-Jen .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 47 (5-6) :271-281
[32]   Evaluating the relationship between process improvement and schedule deviation in software maintenance [J].
Jung, Ho-Won ;
Goldenson, Dennis R. .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 51 (02) :351-361
[33]   Software process improvement - A personal view: How it started and where it is going [J].
Humphrey, Watts S. .
Software Process Improvement and Practice, 2007, 12 (03) :223-227
[34]   Developing SPIM-TA: a maturity-level framework for systematic process improvement in software testing automation [J].
Abrar, Muhammad Faisal ;
Alharbi, Yasser ;
Alsaffar, Muhammad ;
Hussain, Shah ;
Saqib, Muhammad ;
Khan, Jawad ;
Lee, Youngmoon .
AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 16 (08)
[35]   Software test maturity assessment and test process improvement: A multivocal literature review [J].
Garousi, Vahid ;
Felderer, Michael ;
Hacaloglu, Tuna .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 85 :16-42
[36]   Does Software Process Improvement Reduce the Severity of Defects? A Longitudinal Field Study [J].
Harter, Donald E. ;
Kemerer, Chris F. ;
Slaughter, Sandra A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2012, 38 (04) :810-827
[37]   Nursing Information Systems Requirements A Milestone for Patient Outcome and Patient Safety Improvement [J].
Farzandipour, Mehrdad ;
Meidani, Zahra ;
Riazi, Hossein ;
Jabali, Monireh Sadeqi .
CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2016, 34 (12) :601-612
[38]   Effect of knowledge management on software product experience with mediating effect of perceived software process improvement: An empirical study for Indian software industry [J].
Chugh, Mitali ;
Chanderwal, Nitin ;
Upadhyay, Rajesh ;
Punia, Devendra Kumar .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2020, 46 (02) :258-272
[39]   An Evaluation of Software Development Practices among Small Firms in Developing Countries: A Test of a Simplified Software Process Improvement Model [J].
Chevers, Delroy ;
Mills, Annette M. ;
Duggan, Evan ;
Moore, Stanford .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 24 (03) :45-70
[40]   DESCRIPTION OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROCESS FOR EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS [J].
Filip, Florina-Cristina ;
Marascu-Kleine, Vladimir .
MODTECH 2012: NEW FACE OF T M C R, VOLS I AND II, 2012, :365-368