Seismic fragility analysis of geosynthetic-encased stone column composite foundation

被引:0
|
作者
Qiu, Ruizhe [1 ]
Gou, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Kaiwen [1 ,2 ]
El Naggar, M. Hesham [3 ]
Xiao, Kaiwen [1 ]
Zheng, Luobin [4 ]
Wang, Tengfei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab Highspeed Railway Engn, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[3] Western Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A5B9, Canada
[4] China Univ Geosci, Fac Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Railway earthwork; Strip footing; Geosynthetic-encased stone column; Seismic risk assessment; Fragility analysis; Logistic regression; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109095
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) is a cost-effective and efficient soil treatment method widely adopted in seismic regions. Its pivotal role in fortifying foundations enhances the safety of the supported structures. This study focuses on the fragility analysis of GESC composite foundations under seismic loads. The application of Logistic regression, a machine learning technique, derives parameterized fragility functions. These parameterized fragility functions elucidate the effects of GESC diameter, encasement tensile strength, column friction angle and soil variability on the GESC composite foundation's failure probability. The results demonstrated the efficiency of Logistic regression in predicting GESC foundation failure probability, boasting an impressive determination coefficient of up to 99.8 when compared with the Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS). Enhancing the tensile strength of the encasement and the column's friction angle reduces the failure probability in GESC foundations. Also, increasing the replacement ratio reduces the failure probability of the GESC foundation. However, for a constant replacement ratio and the same geosynthetic encasement, the seismic bearing capacity of a composite foundation reinforced by GESCs with small diameter is superior to that reinforced by GESCs with large diameter. Notably, inherent soil variability escalates the failure probability of GESC foundations, emphasizing the importance of selecting high-performance GESCs, especially when treating soil with strength that is characterized with a higher coefficient of variation (COV).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Numerical Simulation of the Load Transfer Mechanism of a Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column Unit Cell under Embankment Loading
    Ji, Mingchang
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Zhao, Yuyao
    Deng, Jialong
    Zheng, Yewei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2024, 24 (08)
  • [42] Numerical Analysis of a Geosynthetic-Encased Granular Pile Anchor Subjected to Uplift Load in Cohesionless Soil
    Roy, Shyam Nandan
    Kumar, Shailendra
    Sawant, Vishwas A.
    Patel, Jignesh B.
    TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2025, 12 (03)
  • [43] Effect of basal reinforcement on performance of floating geosynthetic encased stone column-supported embankment
    Chen, Jian-Feng
    Zhang, Xu
    Yoo, Chungsik
    Gu, Zi-Ang
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2022, 50 (04) : 566 - 580
  • [44] Settlement analysis of geosynthetic encased granular column treated soft clay deposits
    Jayarajan, Jayapal
    Karpurapu, Rajagopal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 14 (05) : 473 - 489
  • [45] 3D coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of geosynthetic encased stone column-supported embankment over soft clay
    Zhang, Xu
    Rajesh, Sathiyamoorthy
    Chen, Jian-Feng
    Zhang, Zhen
    Li, Liang-Yong
    MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (11) : 1285 - 1295
  • [46] Seismic fragility analysis and reliability evaluation for ancient stone pagoda using distinct element method
    Tra, Sanh N.
    Kim, Se Hyun
    Shin, Jiuk
    Lee, Do Hyung
    Park, Heon-Joon
    Lee, Kihak
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 23
  • [47] Analysis of stone column-supported geosynthetic-reinforced embankments
    Deb, Kousik
    Mohapatra, Sunil Ranjan
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (05) : 2943 - 2960
  • [48] Seismic vulnerability assessment and fragility analysis of stone masonry monastic temples in Sikkim Himalayas
    Tripathi, Anu
    Rai, Durgesh C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2019, 13 (02) : 257 - 272
  • [49] Seismic fragility analysis of bridge-isolator-foundation-soil systems in subfreezing temperatures
    Fosoul, Saber A. S.
    Tait, Michael J.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 291
  • [50] Seismic fragility analysis of the Koyna gravity dam with layered rock foundation considering tensile crack failure
    Tidke, Aniket R.
    Adhikary, Shrabony
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2021, 125