Seismic fragility analysis of geosynthetic-encased stone column composite foundation

被引:0
|
作者
Qiu, Ruizhe [1 ]
Gou, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Kaiwen [1 ,2 ]
El Naggar, M. Hesham [3 ]
Xiao, Kaiwen [1 ]
Zheng, Luobin [4 ]
Wang, Tengfei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab Highspeed Railway Engn, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[3] Western Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A5B9, Canada
[4] China Univ Geosci, Fac Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Railway earthwork; Strip footing; Geosynthetic-encased stone column; Seismic risk assessment; Fragility analysis; Logistic regression; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109095
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) is a cost-effective and efficient soil treatment method widely adopted in seismic regions. Its pivotal role in fortifying foundations enhances the safety of the supported structures. This study focuses on the fragility analysis of GESC composite foundations under seismic loads. The application of Logistic regression, a machine learning technique, derives parameterized fragility functions. These parameterized fragility functions elucidate the effects of GESC diameter, encasement tensile strength, column friction angle and soil variability on the GESC composite foundation's failure probability. The results demonstrated the efficiency of Logistic regression in predicting GESC foundation failure probability, boasting an impressive determination coefficient of up to 99.8 when compared with the Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS). Enhancing the tensile strength of the encasement and the column's friction angle reduces the failure probability in GESC foundations. Also, increasing the replacement ratio reduces the failure probability of the GESC foundation. However, for a constant replacement ratio and the same geosynthetic encasement, the seismic bearing capacity of a composite foundation reinforced by GESCs with small diameter is superior to that reinforced by GESCs with large diameter. Notably, inherent soil variability escalates the failure probability of GESC foundations, emphasizing the importance of selecting high-performance GESCs, especially when treating soil with strength that is characterized with a higher coefficient of variation (COV).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance of a geosynthetic-encased column (GEC) in soft ground: numerical and analytical studies
    Almeida, M. S. S.
    Hosseinpour, I.
    Riccio, M.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 20 (04) : 252 - 262
  • [32] Three-dimensional analysis of geosynthetic-encased granular columns for liquefaction mitigation
    Geng, L.
    Tang, L.
    Cong, S. Y.
    Ling, X. Z.
    Lu, J.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 24 (01) : 45 - 59
  • [33] Horizontally Layered and Vertically Encased Geosynthetic Reinforced Stone Column: An Experimental Analysis
    Srijan, Ashok Kumar
    Gupta, Ashok Kumar
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (15):
  • [34] Numerical simulation of bending characteristics of geosynthetic encased stone column
    Qin, Xiang Zhen
    Chen, Jian Feng
    He, Peng Chen
    GEOSHANGHAI 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, VOL 6, 2024, 1335
  • [35] Improvement of soft clay using installation of geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical study
    Choobbasti, Asskar Janalizadeh
    Pichka, Hossein
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 7 (02) : 597 - 607
  • [36] Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads
    Kumar, Neeraj
    Kumar, Rakesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [37] Numerical Study of the Dynamic Response of Stone Column and Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column in Soft Clay
    Zheng, Yewei
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Ji, Mingchang
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: FOUNDATIONS, RETAINING STRUCTURES, AND GEOSYNTHETICS, 2023, : 447 - 455
  • [38] Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests
    Geramian, Atefe
    Ghazavi, M.
    Attari, N. K. A.
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 42 (08) : 7617 - 7634
  • [39] A large-scale shaking table model test for acceleration and deformation response of geosynthetic encased stone column composite ground
    Yang, Fang Ou
    Fan, Gang
    Wang, Kaifeng
    Yang, Chen
    Lyu, Wenqiang
    Zhang, Jianjing
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2021, 49 (05) : 1407 - 1418
  • [40] Experimental analysis of bearing behavior of geosynthetic encased stone columns
    Ouyang Fang
    Zhang Jian-jing
    Fu Xiao
    Han Jian-wei
    Yan Kong-ming
    Du Lin
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2016, 37 (07) : 1929 - 1936